This is Everything2's science writing group, existing to encourage, facilitate and organise the writing and discussion of science on this site. Members are usually willing to give feedback on any writing on scientific topics, answer questions and correct mistakes.

The E2_Science joint user is here make it easier to collectively edit and maintain the various indexes of science topics: Scientists and all its sub-indexes, physics, astronomy, biochemistry and protein. More may follow. It also collects various useful links on its home node.

Note that there is also a separate e^2 usergroup for the discussion of specifically mathematical topics.


Venerable members of this group:

Oolong@+, CapnTrippy, enth, Professor Pi, RainDropUp, Razhumikin, Anark, The Alchemist, tom f, charlie_b, ariels, esapersona, Siobhan, Tiefling, rdude, liveforever, Catchpole, Blush Response, Serjeant's Muse, pimephalis, BaronWR, abiessu, melknia, IWhoSawTheFace, 10998521, sloebertje, getha, siren, pjd, dgrnx, flyingroc, althorrat, elem_125, DoctorX, RPGeek, redbaker, unperson, Iguanaonastick, Taliesin's Muse, Zarkonnen, SharQ, Calast, idan, heppigirl, The Lush, ncc05, Lifix, Akchizar, Palpz, Two Sheds, Gorgonzola, SciPhi, SyntaxVorlon, Redalien, Berek, fallensparks, GunpowderGreen, dichotomyboi, sehrgut, cordyceps, maverickmath, eien_meru, museman, cpt_ahab, mcd, Pandeism Fish, corvus, decoy hunches, Stuart$+, raincomplex, Tem42@
This group of 71 members is led by Oolong@+

    “I would gladly pay you Tuesday for a hamburger today.” -J. Wellington Wimpy

Economists used to not get this joke. We all knew that Wimpy was simply a glutton fueling his eating disorder with more hamburgers than he could afford. But in their world, such a man didn't exist. We were laughing. They'd just blink.

You see, all economists since Adam Smith worked under the rational "economic man" theory, namely, that every potential transaction is judged according to an internal cost-benefit analysis against available means. Meaning, "Can I afford the hamburger at the listed price?" Anything extra, like psychology and emotions, might have an effect on an individual basis, but have negligible effect on the whole of the economy. Plus, those things are really, really complex, and they're economists, not psychologists.

In fact, under this model, the average American household debt in 2001 should have been around $900. It was actually around $5000, with credit card debt interest rates around 18% and investment income around 10%. Clearly this was not a nation of Smiths, but of Wimpys. What model could account for this?

David Laibson is a professor of economics at Harvard who has undertaken some behavioral economics to try and account for the missing factors. He built on work by Richard Herrnstein, who in 1967 developed and tested the theory with pigeons and food. Around 2001 Laibson wrote a series of papers that try and explain what's happening with people and debt. He didn't identify the whats, but the hows. In short: he figured out the discount curve. It works something like this: Sitting down to lunch, most people would prefer to have a hamburger right now than two hamburgers tomorrow at the same price. (I'm actually a vegetarian, but sticking with the Wimpy lede...)

But at some point in the future, this switches, e.g. people would prefer to have 2 hamburgers in 100 days than 1 hamburger in 99 days at the same price. The difference is time. The value we assign to the burger (discount in economics-speak) is higher now, and slowly decreases in time. Push the decision far enough out in the future, and we begin to act like rational actors.

For the mathematically inclined, there's a formula:

    v = V / (1 + kD)

Little v is the discounted value of the burger, big V is the full value of the burger, D is the time between now and the burger delivery, and k is the "degree of discounting". The degree is a fairly big variable, as it's different for younger people than for older, different for wealthy than for poor, different for those addicted to the burger, and different depending on how long it takes to consume the good. (A burger versus a college scholorship, for instance.)

What informs our "irrationality" is all the stuff economists used to wave off: emotions, instant gratification, impulse purchasing. Turns out the curve is more hyperbolic than exponential, and thus the term hyperbolic discounting. Through him economists now have mathematical models that better predict what's actually happening in the real world. (Insert scary that's-how-they-get-you theory here.)

The interesting takeaway is what successfully saves people from the effect, other than simple self-control, which we all know isn't so simple.

The first tactic is to make decisions early enough, such that we're acting on rationality and not impulse, and finding a way of locking the decision in. In economics this might be investing in bonds. In life this might be giving the keys to the snack cabinet to your partner right after you unpack your groceries rather than when you're hungry. This is tied to the second tactic...

The second is that when we invest in "illiquid assets," meaning things that can't be affected by a lack of self control, like a home, we simply don't have the option to act against it on impulse. The process of home buying is too cumbersome for someone to just get rid of on a whim. This is the economic solution for the economic problem, but it begs extending to other areas of our lives...where we're wimpy.


Hyperbolic Discounting and Consumption (with Christopher Harris), February 2001, Eighth World Congress of the Econometric Society.

 


Gorgonzola says re hyperbolic discounting: I suggest to you that a lot of the foreclosure crisis was generated from people buying "too much" house on impulse.

Urinalysis is the analysis of a person’s urine to detect things such as drugs and infections. A person is asked to produce a urine sample; sometimes this will be a mid-stream urine sample to ensure the cleanest possible sample is caught.

First off, the physical characteristic of the urine, such as colour, concentration and cloudiness will be noted. A urine dipstick will then be used to give a rough idea of the properties of the urine, such as the acidity; concentration; presence of glucose (which can be used to monitor the treatment of diabetes mellitus); the presence of blood; protein; white blood cells; and bile. A pregnancy test is a form of urinalysis that detects the presence of human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) which is a hormone secreted by the embryo.

The urine sample can then be sent off to a lab for further testing. Here they can perform further, more sensitive chemical tests to detect drug levels (such as for drug testing in athletes). The lab is also able to culture the urine to see if there is are bacteria present that are causing a urinary tract infection; a small drop of the urine is placed on the surface of a nutrient gel. Any bacteria present will grow colonies that can be identified by a microbiologist.

A drop of urine is also placed on a slide and looked at under a microscope. Things that can be seen include red blood cells (haematuria) which indicate possible kidney damage, fragments of proteins and kidney cells, pus (from infection), and crystals (which can indicate a metabolic illness). The eggs of the schistosomiasis parasite can be also identified by using a microscope.

Omega-3 Fatty Acids are not just some kind of "Alternative anti-depressant fad" like St. John's Wort, and eating a tablespoon a day of flax oil (as most supplements recommend) is going to do far more good than harm. Omega-3s are essential fatty acids, meaning they play vital, necessary roles within the body. Strangely enough, the entire medical community can agree that "EFAs" really are necessary to survival, yet the FDA has not required food producers to label the EFA content of their product, nor have they established a recommended daily allowance of EFA. This may be because it would be impossible for them to actually come up with a way to meet the requirement without supplementation, which the FDA tends to scorn. The reason they are becoming popular is simple -- people are finally learning about them. Chances are, you don't consume enough of them, and you probably consume too much of what you don't need.

It's true that there are "good fats" and "bad fats." Though it is true that anything is dangerous in excess, it is also true that there is a huge difference between consuming fats that are absolutely necessary, and consuming fats that serve no useful role in the body. Strangely enough, the American diet emphasizes excessive consumption of unnecessary and potentially dangerous trans fatty acids, which are present in the "partially hydrogenated oil" that is present in nearly every form of processed food found at the supermarket, restaurant, and home kitchen. It is true that one should aim to keep their "total fat" consumption below 30% of their total caloric consumption. But this doesn't mean that any single source of fat is fine. A varied diet is necessary, and if one is unaware of Omega-3s, they are not likely to consume enough of them. Thousands of years ago, humans consumed large amounts of Omega-3s by eating the flesh of animals that lived on a free-range, varied diet. Most of today's corn and soy-fed animals are just as deficient as we are. Fortunately, it is possible to buy free-range fed meats in some areas. My local supermarket has "Free Range Omega-3 Enriched Eggs" that cost a little more, but contain far more Omega-3 and Vitamin E than standard eggs. It is probably not a good idea to thoroughly scramble the eggs, as this will oxidize most of the healthy Omega-3s. Instead, fry the egg on both sides in a little olive oil or non-hydrogenated margarine (e.g. "Smart Balance(tm)" or "Spectrum Essentials(tm)") and enjoy the yolky goodness on some toast. Most of the fat, good or bad, is in the yolk.

Omega-3s can not be manufactured in the human body, so they must be consumed from other food sources. The best sources include ground flax seeds, hemp seeds, certain nuts such as walnuts, certain varieties of algae and seaweed, and coldwater, freshwater fish like salmon. Omega-3s are used in the creation of cell membranes. They are polyunsaturated, meaning they are very fluid at room temperature, and can remain fluidlike at temperatures approaching freezing. Due to their polyunsaturated structure, they are sensitive to heat and light, and must be extracted from seeds using "cold expeller press" techniques. Even this generates some heat, potentially destroying a percentage of the fat, possibly oxidizing it into something that is actually detrimental to your health. The best way to go is fresh-ground flax seeds. Don't grind them in advance, just grind enough to consume at once. While they are in seed form, they are useless to you, but they are also protected from oxidation. Once they are ground, they begin to deteriorate. This is why I think it's pointless to buy anything that contains ground flax. Flax is a better Omega-3 source than hemp, unless one manages to eat a lot of Omega-3 rich food already. The reason is simple; flax oil is mostly composed of Omega-3, hemp oil is mostly Omega-6. Hemp oil contains far more Omega-3 than soy oil, but flax oil tops them all. Have some fish too, if possible -- fish and other sea-based sources are more rich in DHA and EPA, which are suspected of serving important roles in brain development.

Their inherent polyunsaturated "fluidity" is essential to the function of the selectively permeable membrane that covers every cell in your body. This membrane is composed of fatty acids, preferably with a high percentage of Omega-3s. Unfortunately, the modern American diet has highly skewed the proportion of Omega-3s consumed in relation to other essential, non-essential, and even dangerous types of fatty acids. In other words, we eat way too much of what we don't need, way way too little of what we do.

Omega-3s are also used to create anti-inflammatory prostaglandin hormones. If one neglects to eat enough of the right fats, hormonal imbalances can occur. Most of the fatty acids we consume are actually used in the manufacture of inflammatory prostaglandins. Omega-3s, on the other hand, are used to create anti-inflammatory hormones. Without the proper balance, the circulatory system is at constant war with itself, like an allergic reaction within the body. Many researchers think that prostaglandin imbalance (and hence Omega-3 deficiency) is what allows arteries to become "hardened" in the first place. The arterial plaque gets stuck in the scar tissue that forms as a result of the constant inflammation, whereas healthy arteries are very smooth and do not have the inner "traction" for fat to actually accumulate.

So what's this about them being used to treat depression? Well, it turns out that certain Omega-3s (particularily DHA, Docosahexaenoic Acid) may play important roles in brain function. Studies have shown that they may alleviate symptoms of schizophrenia, and can lower aggression and depression in some people. Researchers have also demonstrated that there is a correlation between the ratio of Omega-6 and Omega-3 fatty acids in one's diet and their likelihood to suffer from depression and heart disease.

The problem is that we tend to primarily eat Omega-6 sources, and the same goes for our livestock. The resulting imbalance causes a positive feedback loop where the little Omega-3 that is consumed is never metabolized entirely. Because Omega-6 and Omega-3 fats compete for the same enzymes, an imbalanced ratio is skewed even further.

If you choose to buy flax seed oil, never buy it from a store that doesn't keep it refrigerated. Make sure it tastes nutty, but not bitter. Rancid oil is bad for you. The same goes for olive oil, which contains an almost inconsequential amount of Omega-3. The reason olive oil is good for you is because it is mostly comprised of oleic acid, a very stable, monounsaturated fatty acid that is not destroyed easily during cooking. Omega-3-rich oils should never be used for cooking, as they are far more likely to deform into unhealthy fats. Some people advocate the use of canola oil to increase Omega-3 consumption, but canola oil is usually highly refined at over 400°F to remove the natural stink of the seeds. This destroys most of the Omega-3 content, and the high temperatures actually hydrogenate a small percentage (around 4%) of the oil through hot chemical reactions. This is the reason that some European countries restrict trans fat percentages to 5% or lower; any heat-refined oil inevitably will contain a small percentage of artificial crap. This is bad, but not as bad as the deliberate hydrogenation process that converts up to 50% of soybean oil into trans fat.

Additional note: MissCreant is right, Omega-3s do wonders for pets with dandruff or shedding problems. As a matter of fact, most "pet supplements" designed to alleviate this problem consist of Omega-6 and Omega-3 fatty acid sources. Usually there's a large proportion of soybean oil, which has very little Omega-3. I prefer to give my cat pure flax oil, which has an almost immediate impact on his chronic dandruff problems. If I don't give him flax for a week, his dandruff is so bad that I can brush him indefinitely without getting rid of it. It's all over his back. Two days after a dose of flax, and it's almost entirely gone.

Why is this? Well, skin and hair cells are covered with bi-lipid membranes just like any other cell. Most of your cells are internal, and are surrounded by liquid at all times. The same can't be said for your hair and skin, which face the ravages of exposure to the air and sun. Omega-3s keep your cell membranes flexible, alive, and well. If you have chronic "night itching," try some flax oil. I used to have "ashy" itchy skin myself, especially at night, and now it's a rare occurrence that serves to remind me that I haven't been taking my flax oil.

Did you know that each and every red-blooded, truck-drivin', titty-lovin' manly man has a vagina? Well, a vestigial vagina, anyhow.

The vagina masculina, also known as the prostatic utricle or utriculus prostaticus, is located in the prostatic urethra, near the ejaculatory ducts. Basically, it's a piece of tissue that dangles uselessly from the bladder.

Where does this little bit of womanhood come from? In sexless embryos, two ducts called Mullerian Ducts empty into the cloaca – a sort of all-purpose hole. Should that embryo become female, the ducts become the vagina, uterus and oviducts.

In dudes, however, the ducts shrivel up and become that teensy-weensy speck of vaginal tissue, the vagina masculina.


Submitted to BrevityQuest 2006 because, hey, that's all, folks!