In considering what it means for some act to be legal or illegal, it helps to distinguish levels of prohibition and entitlement. (As ever, this applies in england and wales, but should be portable to other English Law jurisdictions).

Prohibitions:

Criminal
Doing this act will leave you liable to criminal penalties. This may mean things like prison and criminal records.
Civil liability
Someone in particular can sue you. Depending on the case in question you could be fined, ordered to do (or not do) something, or have property confiscated. If you do insist on doing this kind of thing, consider:
  • How likely is the party to sue you (consider relative costs, bloody-mindedness, and anything else you think relevant)?
  • What kind of cost could you suffer if you fail? Will it be cheaper to just take the consequences?
  • How likely are the courts to want to award exemplary damages if they found out you thought paying up would be cheaper?
Not specifically allowed
This may be a legal grey area, but more likely than not, if someone is claiming that something in this category is "illegal", then they are bullshitting you.
Law is ambiguous
You could potentially be facing civil or criminal liability, but insufficient precedent exists to decide what the law is; this is usually because prosecutions are usually pointless and/or really really hard. The canonical example is home duplication of copyright materials: While english statute has no doctrine of fair use, it is probably illegal to do things like tape your CD's for use in the car, rip mp3's for use in you Archos, and so on. But there is at least one authority supporting fair use; the judiciary might be persuaded to create such a doctrine; furthermore, the penalties excated might be slight
Entitlement:
Absolute entitlement
You can do this. No-one can stop you. You can fuck anyone up who stops you, criminal style, and quite probably civilly as well.
Civil entitlement
You can do this, but any abrogation would only allow you to take civil action. Pushing the matter except in a court may be criminal. Example: Contractual right.
Not prohibited
You are not actually prohibited from doing this. Anyone stopping you may or may not be legally able to do this. Examples include trying to stop you from entering a public place such as a shop (assuming that neither of you have a property right in the land); if they use such tactics as blocking your path, then there is very little you can do about it (other than alert the owner); if they try to stop you violently, then you have recourse against them for their violence

This 2025 song by ingenue artist PinkPantheress is ostensibly about using marijuana, but intentionally left ambiguous aaaand (subject to interpretation), possibly about having sex (while on drugs) as well as, possibly in exchange for more drugs.

The song makes it very clear from its opening lines that the person Pink involves herself with for this purpose is new to her:

My name is Pink and I'm really glad to meet you
You're recommended to me by some people
....
Oh,  what's your name? I don't know  what I should call ya....


Of course, the key point of the song is in the lines:

Oooooooooh is this illegal?
Oooooooooh it feels illegal.


This really gets to the heart of the fuzziness of modernity as to questions of sexuality and recreational drug use, and perhaps the casual exchange of one for the other. The sense that the song is about the latter is best conveyed in the chorus:

One after one, now you're sittin' on my bed
Then, later on, we can talk on it instead
Two into one while you're sittin' on my bed
Then, later on, I can feel shame in my head


"Two into one" especially could invoke the sort of unity of souls which comes with recognition of one another's divine essence. Or it could just be shagging. It's probably shagging, the making of the proverbial "beast with two backs." Shame would not seem to be an emotion arising simply from the doing of drugs, and probably not simply from the having of sex stirred by spontaneous attraction. And another line which does not seem like it would make sense under modern sensibilities if it was simply about the drug use:

As long as you don't tell all your best mates


One other clue is that earlier in the song, right after the introduction of the characters, Pink adds "Here's twenty for ya." The singer being a Brit, this would be twenty pounds, but that's not plenty different from twenty dollars in the Twenty-twenties, which means, given modern drug economics, it's not a lot to be paying for some drugs. And yet the last non-choral verse in the song is:

I think I smoked enough loud to reach the both of us
But tell me why my heartbeat is in a rush


"Loud" being another word the kids are using for marijuana these days means that the singer probably smoked quite a bit more than that twenty pounds worth of the stuff (though not, of course, twenty pounds avoirdupois of it), but enough that she'd have to have given something more in payment. In one interview, the songwriter herself explained, "At first, it was actually about using a male escort. And then I was like, 'This is a bit ridiculous, because I've never done that.' So I'm going to kind of leave it up to the listener to figure it out but it ended up being about buying weed."

Intended or not, then, the sense of a sexual element as part of the commercial exchange may simply be left over from the original thrust of the song.

And here is the video you'll be wanting to watch, which weirdly seems to have the drug dealer be the one to be experiencing the crazy drug trip.



For IRON NODER XVIII: NEGLIGENCE IS THE RUST OF THE SOUL

Il*le"gal (?), a. [Pref. il- not + legal: cf. F. ill'egal.]

Not according to, or authorized by, law; specif., contrary to, or in violation of, human law; unlawful; illicit; hence, immoral; as, an illegal act; illegal trade; illegal love.

Bp. Burnet.

 

© Webster 1913.

Log in or register to write something here or to contact authors.