an explanation seems clear:
The creator of this theory which i couldn't claim to understand because of the confusing terminology must actually be an AI generated by the very same theory. this explains a number of puzzles:
  1. the author is somewhat incomprehensible due to the flawed nature of the theory.
  2. the author sounds more like a philosopher than a scientist. (aren't all philosophers Intelligences trying to explain the theory behind that which created them?)
  3. poor social interaction is symptomatic of a failed AI-Complete solution IMHO. (in this case spamming would simply be failed attempts to communicate like other actual people.)
it occurrs to me that i cannot have been the first to put forward this theory, as it is so obvious, if anyone could enlighten me as to it's original creator i would appreciate the correction.