In the beginning, when computers were created, there was only memory (which was made of bits, beads, digits or whatever you call them), and memory was organized into registers, and registers were grouped into a register file. However, there was usually only one of them, so it didn't need much of a filesystem. (Bits are made of flop-flops, which are put on buses, but that's a different story.)

As technology advanced, and memory expanded beyond available address space (i.e. the address bus ran out of bits), memory was then organized into banks. Of course, you can never have enough memory (or money), so mechanical means of duplicating large amounts memory for extended storage were needed, so the drum was invented. The drum still used addresses, for its organization.

Then there was tape. Tape was much bigger than drum, so it was organized into fields and files. However, since the tape is linear, just putting the files on tape one after the other was pretty much good enough. (Some people used archives to collect multiple files into one file, but I'm getting ahead of myself.)

Then there was disk. Disks had sectors, tracks, then cylinders, and later, blocks and clusters, but that's just the physical organization, and the start of the mapping of the physical to the logical.

On your disk, you could just put your files on the disk one a after the other, like with a tape. Or, since disk is random access (like memory), you could just address the blocks directly. But this gets real cumbersome quick, especially when you forget which block you started your file at, or if you had to put multiple growing files on the disk at once. So, in the first file on the disk, you make an index to all the other files, and call it a directory. *POOF*, you now have a filesystem! Later enhancements added the subdirectory and directory tree. (And of course, you can then group multiple disk files into one big file and put that on tape in an archive...or you could just make a filesystem image, but I digress.)

Of course, the filesystem was invented, and reinvented for each new computer system, and none of them were very compatible. Sometimes filesystems were invented just for a specific media, and then people suddenly want standards, so a few filesystems were created for that purpose. And sometimes innovations like the journaling filesystem inspires whole new filesystems.

That's the story of the filesystem.

 

Here's a few system specific filesystems... /msg me if you think of more.

Microsoft filesystems: fat, vfat, fat32, ntfs

CD-ROM and DVD filesystems: iso9660, rock ridge, high sierra, (Romeo), joliet (mscdex), UDF

Unix filesystems: SysV "fs", BSD "fast filesystem", ufs, xfs ext2, (fsck)

Macintosh filesystems: HFS, HFS+

Network filesystems: (these are really virtual filesystems) NFS, AFS, SMB, CIFS, NDS

Journaling filesystems: IBM JFS, Veritas VxFS, NTFS, SGI XFS, Linux ext3, reiserfs, BeOS BFS, Novell NSS, HFS+ post os X 10.2.3

 

This was brought to you by the Save Our Archaic Technical Terms Society.

I'd like to thank those that already noded the filesystems listed above.

Log in or registerto write something here or to contact authors.