I've been asked a few times since I commented on the King James Bible edit for some documentation on James' homosexuality and misogyny. Unfortunately, I no longer have the book from which I first got the information, but my very brief cursory dig turned up two good references pointing to the King's taste for the companionship of men. As I find more on his dislike of women, I'll add it.

From "The Queens of England" by Norah Lofts, in the chapter 'Anne of Denmark, Queen of James I', page 124:

"If Anne of Denmark is shown to posterity as a rather irritable and irritating woman, she may perhaps be excused, for she was one of those unfortunate women married to a bi-sexual man."

And (same book, page 125):

"James appeared to be deeply grieved by her death, and it is possible that despite their quarrels, she had excersized some influence upon him. He outlived her by seven years and his devotion to his male favorites became more conspicuous. Manners at Court declined to a point at which no lady wished to be seen there."

And from "The Oxford Book of Royal Anecdotes" by Elizabeth Longford, in the chapter 'James I', page 250:

"James and his favorite (the Duke of) Buckingham exchanged many loving letters. One from Buckingham began "Dear Dad and Gossip" and ended with "Your most humble slave and dog, Steenie."

And (same book, page 250):

"...Now, as no other reason appeared in favour of their choyce but handsomenesse, so the love the King shewed was as amorously conveyed as if he had mistaken their sex, and thought them ladies; which I have seen Sommerset and Buckingham labour to resemble, in the effiminatenesse of their dressings, though in Whoreson looks and wanton gestures, they exceed the part of any womankind my conversation did ever cope withall."

I get the biggest kick from modern "christians" who rant against homosexuality, and point to their beloved "1611 KJV" bible as containing the evidence that "God hates fags", when it was in fact commisioned and edited by one.

About the homosexuality: Around page 566 of my copy of Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841), Chuck Mackay goes into some detail about James I's being -- ahem -- "addicted to the most abominable of all offences" in the person of a young Scotsman named Robert Kerr. Everybody in the episode comes to a bad end, mostly by poisoning each other.

Be the evidence compelling or no, people have certainly been suspecting it since at least as far back as 1841, and Mackay claims that it was widely rumored in James I's time already.

I don't recall Mackay saying anything about James I being a misogynist, and I can't find anything on skimming through at the moment. Mackay was writing in 1841, though, a time when attitudes about women were very different than they are now. I'm not sure that what we call misogyny would have registered on Mackay as anything in particular. Reification, anyone?

Again according to Mackay, James I was also a staunch opponent of witchcraft.
James Stuart was the great-great-grandson of King Henry VII of England. James' mother, Mary, Queen of Scots, was the grandchild of Henry's daughter Margaret through her first husband (James IV of Scotland), and James' father Lord Darnley, though Margaret and her second husband. Lord Darnley was murdered in February 1567 when James was eight months old, and because Mary was suspected to have been involved in her husband's murder, she was forced to abdicate the throne of Scotland that July. Hence her son became King James VI of Scotland at barely a year old.

As would be expected, his childhood found him a pawn of the nobles and clergy of Scotland, though he did receive a very good education and was always scholarly. He married Anne of Denmark in 1590; the two apparently made a good couple, as James is often described as effeminate (and quite likely was homosexual) and Anne as rather masculine. The two had several children, but after Anne's death in 1619 James centered his attention on George "Steenie" Villiers, to whom he gave titles and lands.

When Elizabeth I of England died childless in 1603, she had named James as the heir to the throne shortly before dying. All the children of Henry VIII of England were dead and none were parents themselves, so the descendants of Henry VII were the next closest members of the royal family. Elizabeth was probably not pleased to name James, whose mother Elizabeth had executed to keep her from conspiring against England, as her successor, but he was the best choice of those available.

James was quite pleased, however, to become James I of England as well as James VI of Scotland. He saw it as a chance to get out from under the thumb of those who had manipulated him in Scotland. He was a great believer in the divine right of kings, though he didn't press his point when Parliament refused to vote him extra money and instead made up a new title, that of baronet, and sold this honor to raise money for himself.

During James' reign the Catholic Guy Fawkes plot to blow up the houses of Parliament took place, and though it was discovered before any damage was done, James became rather paranoid. He was devoutly Protestant, but clashed with the extreme Puritans of England as much as he did the Catholics. He did comission the Bible translation which to this day is known as the King James version. His general ideas of the power of the monarch set the stage for the revolution was to happen in the reign of his son Charles I.

James died of kidney failure and a stroke on 27 March 1625.

King of Scotland (1406-1437) and poet
Born 1394 Died 1437

James the son of King Robert III, was born at Dunfermline in July 1394. After the death of his mother, Annabella Drummond of Stobhall, in 1402, he was placed under the care of Henry Wardlaw (d. 1440), who became bishop of St Andrews in 1403, but soon his father resolved to send him to France. Robert doubtless decided upon this course owing to the fact that in 1402 his elder son, David, Duke of Rothesay, had met his death in a mysterious fashion, being probably murdered by his uncle, Robert, Duke of Albany, who, as the king was an invalid, was virtually the ruler of Scotland. On the way to France, however, James fell into the hands of some English sailors and was sent to Henry IV, who refused to admit him to ransom. The chronicler Thomas Walsingham, says that James's imprisonment began in 1406, while the future king himself places it in 1404; February 1406 is probably the correct date.

On the death of Robert III in April 1406 James became nominally king of Scotland, but he remained a captive in England, the government being conducted by his uncle, Robert of Albany, who showed no anxiety to procure his nephew's release. Dying in 1420, Albany was succeeded as regent by his son, Murdoch.

At first James was confined in the Tower of London, but in June 1407 he was removed to the castle at Nottingham, whence about a month later he was taken to Evesham. His education was continued by capable tutors, and he not only attained excellence in all manly sports, but became perhaps more cultured than any other prince of his age. In person he was short and stout, but well-proportioned and very strong. His agility was not less remarkable than his strength; he excelled in all athletic feats which demanded suppleness of limb and quickness of eye. As regards his intellectual. attainments he is reported to have been acquainted with philosophy, and it is evident from his subsequent career that he had studied jurisprudence; moreover, besides being proficient in vocal and instrumental music, he cultivated the art of poetry with much success. When Henry V became king in March 1413, James was again imprisoned in the Tower of London, but soon afterwards he was taken to Windsor and was treated with great con sideration by the English king. In 1420, with the intention of detaching the Scottish auxiliaries from the French standard, he was sent to take part in Henry's campaign in France; this move failed in its immediate object and he returned to England after Henry's death in 1422.

About this time negotiations for the release of James were begun in earnest, and in September 1423 a treaty was signed at York, the Scottish nation undertaking to pay a ransom of 60,000 marks "for his maintenance in England". By the terms of the treaty James was to wed a noble English lady, and on the 12th of February 1424 he was married at Southwark to Jane, daughter of John Beaufort, Earl of Somerset, a lady to whom he was faithful through life. Ten thousand marks of his ransom were remitted as Jane's dowry, and in April 1424 James and his bride entered Scotland.

With the reign of James I, whose coronation took place at Scone on the 21st of May 1424, constitutional sovereignty may be said to begin in Scotland. By the introduction of a system of statute law, modelled to some extent on that of England, and by the additional importance assigned to parliament, the leaven was prepared which was to work towards the destruction of the indefinite authority of the king and of the unbridled licence of the nobles. During the parliament held at Perth in March 1425 James arrested Murdoch, Duke of Albany, and his son, Alexander; together with Albany's eldest son, Walter, and Duncan, Earl of Lennox, who had been seized previously; they were sentenced to death, and the four were executed at Stirling.

In a parliament held at Inverness in 1427 the king arrested many turbulent northern chiefs, and his whole policy was directed towards crushing the power of the nobles. In this he was very successful. Expeditions reduced the Highlands to order; earldom after earldom was forfeited; but this vigour aroused the desire for revenge, and at length cost James his life. Having been warned that he would never again cross the Forth, the king went to reside in Perth just before Christmas 1436. Among those whom he had angered was Sir Robert Graham (d. 1437), who had been banished by his orders. Instigated by the king's uncle, Walter Stewart, Earl of Atholl (d. 1437), and aided by the royal chamberlain, Sir Robert Stewart, and by a band of Highlanders, Graham burst into the presence of James on the night of the 20th of February 1437 and stabbed the king to death. Graham and Atholl were afterwards tortured and executed.

James had two sons: Alexander, who died young, and James II, who succeeded to the throne; and six daughters, among them being Margaret, the queen of Louis XI of France. His widow, Jane, married Sir James Stewart, the 'black knight of Lorne', and died on the 15th of July 1445.

During the latter part of James's reign difficulties arose between Scotland and England and also between Scotland and the papacy. Part of the king's ransom was still owing to England; other causes of discord between the two nations existed, and in 1436 these culminated in a short war. In ecclesiastical matters James showed himself merciless towards heretics, but his desire to reform the Scottish Church and to make it less dependent on Rome brought him into collision with Popes Martin V and Eugenius IV.

James was the author of two poems, the Kingis Quair and Good Counsel (a short piece of three stanzas). The Song of Absence, Peblis to the Play and Christis Kirk on the Greene have been ascribed to him without evidence. The Kingis Quair (preserved in the Selden MS. B.24 in the Bodleian) is an allegorical poem of the cours d'amour type, written in seven-lined Chaucerian stanzas and extending to 1379 lines. It was composed during James's captivity in England and celebrates his courtship of Lady Jane Beaufort. Though in many respects a Chaucerian pastiche, it not rarely equals its model in verbal and metrical felicity. Its language is an artificial blend of northern and southern (Chaucerian) forms, of the type shown in Lancelot of the Laik and the Quair of Jelusy.

Bibliography. - The contemporary authorities for the reign of James I. are Andrew of Wyntoun, The Orygynale Cronykil of Scotland, edited by D. Laing (Edinburgh, 1872-1879); and Walter Bower's continuation of John of Fordun's Scotichronicon, edited by T. Hearne (Oxford, 1722). See also J. Pinkerton, History of Scotland (1797); A. Lang, History of Scotland, vol. i. (1900); and G. Burnett, Introduction to the Exchequer Rolls of Scotland (Edinburgh, 1878-1901).

The Kingis Quair was first printed in the Poetical Remains of James the First, edited by William Tytler (1783). Later editions are Morison's reprint (Perth, 1786); J. Sibbald's, in his Chronicle of Scottish Poetry (1802, vol. i.); Thomson's in 1815 and 1824; G. Chalmers's, in his Poetic Remains of some of the Scottish Kings (1824); Rogers's Poetical Remains of King James the First (1873); Skeat's edition published by the Scottish Text Society (1884). An attempt has been made to dispute James's authorship of the poem, but the arguments elaborated by J. T. T. Brown (The Authorship of the Kingis Quair, Glasgow, 1896) have been convincingly answered by Jusserand in his Jacques Ier d'Ecosse fut-il poete? Etude sur l'authenticite du cahier du roi (Paris, 1897, reprinted from the Revue historique, vol. lxiv.). See also the full correspondence in the Athenaeum (July-Aug. 1896 and Dec. 18 99); W. A. Neilson, Origins and Sources of the Court of Love (Boston, 1899) pp. 152 etc., 235 etc.; and Gregory Smith, Transition Period (1900), pp. 40, 41.

Being the entry for JAMES I in the 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica, the text of which lies within the public domain.

Log in or registerto write something here or to contact authors.