You are presented with the four cards shown below, and told that each card has a number on one side, and a letter on the other.
```
-----  -----  -----  -----
|   |  |   |  |   |  |   |
| 2 |  | 7 |  | J |  | R |
|   |  |   |  |   |  |   |
-----  -----  -----  -----
```
You are told to determine which cards must be turned over in order to test the validity of the following statement:

If a card has a J on one side, then it must have a 7 on the other side

This will serve as a sort of buffer paragraph to prevent you from inadvertently cheating. It is highly recommended that you actually take the two seconds and figure out which cards you would turn over. This particular test is a third- or fourth-generation derivative of Peter Wason's original test of logical reasoning, which was devised in 1966, but the structure and analysis are identical (well, not my analysis below, but the way in which the answers you choose partially indicate your capacity for logic).

And now, you will find out what your answers say about you:

If you chose to turn over the J, consider yourself a literate English speaker. That is, just about anyone with a basic understanding of English will get this answer right. From a logical standpoint, you recognize that the statement If P then Q is violated if P is true but Q is false.

If you chose to turn over the R, then you either (a) read the question wrong, (b) mistrust the experimenter (i.e., you think that there's a possibility that the statement each card has a number on one side and a letter on the other was a lie or trick (which it was not)), or (c) think that the statement If P then Q can be proven false under some condition in which P is not true. Unfortunately, if (c) is the case, you have next to no capacity for logical reasoning.

If you chose to turn over the 7, then you, like many people, made the erroneous assumption that if a J is not on the other side of the 7, then the statement would be false. The statement made no condition for cards with 7's on them, only J's. If the card has a J on the back, the statement is true. If the card does not have a J on the back, the statement still holds. Still confused? See the truth table for implication below.

If you chose to turn over the 2 then consider yourself as being in at least the 90th percentile (might be higher, I don't remember the actual numbers) for this test. Maybe you're very clever, or maybe you've taken an introductory course in philosophy or mathematical analysis. In any case, you recognized that on the back of the 2 there had to be a letter besides J in order for the statement to be true: If not-Q, then not-P, which is the contrapositive, and thus the logical equivalent of If P then Q.

If that was all too convoluted and you just wanted the answers, they were J and 2. Why, you ask? I already explained! But I'll explain again by way of the following truth table for implications:

```
P | Q | P => Q
----------------
T | T |   T
T | F |   F
F | T |   T
F | F |   T
```
To show that humans are capable of formal reasoning at all, Griggs & Cox (1982) devised a version of the Wason selection task which uses a real-world example instead of an abstract task.
Again, you are presented with four cards (shown below). Each of them has the name of a drink on one side, and a number (age of a person) on the other. You are told the following rule:
If a person drinks beer, (s)he has to be over 21 years old.
```--------  --------  --------   ---------
|      |  |      |  |      |   |       |
| Beer |  | Cola |  |  23  |   |  16   |
|      |  |      |  |      |   |       |
--------  --------  --------   ---------
```

Now, which of the cards would you turn over to check whether the rule is correct?
Most people find this task much easier than the original Wason Selection Task. (The answer is, of course, to turn over the cards with Beer and 16). The tasks are essentially the same, but real-world thinking simplifies the reasoning enormously.

Log in or register to write something here or to contact authors.