A solipsistic belief set; basically you are the center of the universe, as the universe is only made up of the set of your perceptions. Nobody else matters since life is just a game or a dream anyway. I've felt this way at times, but when I do, I view it in terms of altruistic solipsism instead. My standard beliefs are one of soulism instead.

I wrote this essay long before I ever even heard about solipsism. It's interesting to see that just a simple thought experiment is actually followed as complete belief by some.

DISCLAIMER: This essay has been written by me, it's not a cut and paste job and a pretty good english translation of the dutch original. There's only one other version around and that's the original dutch version.


Analysis of a possible perception of Reality


Introduction

This essay will consist of a theory of my own design and the consequences it will have.
The theory is about a way on which someone can perceive and process his or her environment. It will begin with the theory itself and an explanation on what it exactly entails. After this, several conclusions will be drawn, assuming the theory is true.


The Theory

The theory of this essay is as follows:

  • Everything I experience is the only thing that exists


This theory needs a little explaining. What I try to say with this theory is that everything I perceive (see, hear, smell, taste, feel) is the only thing that exists. My complete reality is build from my own observations. This can not be disproved; someone can tell me for example that he or she has been playing soccer in the afternoon. But how can I be sure of that if I weren’t there? Every piece of evidence that might be produced for this will never be sufficient unless I was there and saw it with my own eyes.
All the data that originates from any other source than my own senses can be a forgery. World events that I see on the television could maybe be nothing more than the actual picture and sound that I receive from the television itself. Even the news readers would be nothing more than just a picture on the screen. At this very moment, behind the closed door of my room, there could be absolutely nothing there! Not until I open the door will my reality be expanded by another room.


Drawn Conclusions:


The Reality is being built by me

Everything around me changes except for myself. Nothing of what I perceive is a constant, everything is changeable. Everything except, for the fact that I’m always present. By purely observing these facts, I can only conclude that I’m the cause of my own environment. There is nothing else that is always present besides myself.


I’m the centre of the universe

If the reality is being built by me, then I am the origin of everything around me. Like an opening flower, I create everything around me. Therefore I am literally always the center of my environment. No matter if I move to the left or the right, I will always remain in the center.


The universe = my universe

If everything stated above is true, then I will have to adjust my perspective. Instead of being an insignificant particle in the universe, I am the glowing center. I am the beginning and the end, I am the origin of everything and nothing can exist without me. Because of this, I am unconsciously the lord and master of my universe. Granted though, my universe has shrunk from thousands of light years to a room of 4 by 6 meter.


In what measure do I control my reality?

Since I can’t make houses disappear with a mere thought, or can make elephants fly with a mere frown of my eyebrow, I will have to assume that the creation of my reality is done entirely subconsciously. This doesn’t seem so strange to me as I look at my surroundings. Everything is so incredibly full of details that I am sure I will never be able to think this up consciously.


If I am the centre, then what are you?

This theory has until now held up its own when I put it to the test against inanimate objects such as rooms, chairs, computers and philosophy essays. But if everything is only temporary and fluid, then what is a person? Just like all the other things in the world, a person is only temporary. But a person lives in my eyes, a person thinks, feels and has feelings of its own. This makes me look differently at people in contrast as to how I look at, for example, a streetlight. Still, as soon as I can’t perceive a person anymore, he or she will seize to exist and will not return until I perceive him or her once again. In the mean time that person will seize existing. In other words, another person will never be my equal.


Am I then all alone?

Since no one is real, but only a thought, I am afraid that I’m all alone in this universe of mine. I will never meet someone with the same position in my reality as myself, since there can be only one center. This thought is one of the most disturbing that has evolved from this theory. Just like everyone, I feel the need to socialize with others. But the thought that none of them are real, makes the chasm between them and me unbearably large.


If I have complete control over myself, then I will have complete control over my reality

If I am the origin of everything around me, then I will be the one who exerts control over my reality. If I could control myself enough, then I would also be able to control my reality to a certain extent. In a way I am already doing that by performing every day actions. Making a sandwich is also a form of exerting my control. But if I could control myself completely, then I would also be able to control my reality completely. I would know no boundaries anymore, the possibilities of what I would be able to do would be limitless.


End word

I just want to make clear that I don’t accept this theory as the truth. It’s just interesting to look at everything from a completely different angle. Sometimes this will create interesting perspectives on all kinds of problems. The most important statement that I want to make with this essay is that the way people perceive something is not necessarily the correct way to look at it. Since there are a thousand and one different angles which are just as valid as the one you use yourself.
Therefore I want to encourage that everyone should always appreciate unknown or unorthodox ideas, not just because they could be practical, but because they provide fresh insights.

It is generally believed that solipsism is an entirely hypothetical reality whose possibility is impossible to refute. Well, here's an epistemological refutation to test that belief:

1a. The human mind develops.

2a. The state of the human mind can only change with perception to affect its state, or the acceptance of the existence of a body by which it might mature.
2b. The body exists.

3a. Perception requires a body to mediate the alteration of the mind.
3b. The body exists.

4a. The human mind alters itself.
4b. The human mind is divided in will, as the reformative state alters the conservative state.
4c. The reformative state and the conservative state are differentiated entities.
4d. There are two human minds, which must exist in two seperate spaces, therefore as seperate conginent existents.
4e. The body exists.

5a. A body is defined by the space or contingency it assumes.
5b. The body exists.

There is no way in which the human mind can change without the existence of a body, and therefore a spatial world.

Anyone with comments, corrections or critiques, please message me -- I think this argument is pretty solid, but there may be a hole here or there to fill!

So*lip"sism (?), n. [L. solus alone + ipse self.]

1. Ethics

Egotism.

Krauth-Fleming.

2. Metaph.

Egoism.

Krauth-Fleming.

 

© Webster 1913.

Log in or registerto write something here or to contact authors.