There are many different ways of conceptually approaching quantum field theory. I find that the most satisfying way of understanding quantum field theory is to think of it as a cross between [special relativity] and [quantum mechanics].

[Quantum Mechanics] deals with the behavior of some given number of particles which may interact with each other and/or with some [external force|external forces]. The [quantum theory] that you’re interested in (This includes the number of [particle|particles], all external forces, and the way they [interact]) can usually be represented by a mathematical operator known as the [Hamiltonian]. For example, your Hamiltonian might describe the interaction between an [electron] and a [proton], or a single electron sitting in a [magnetic field].

What [special relativity] adds to this is the notion that matter and energy are one and the same, (most readily demonstrated by Einstein’s famous formula E=mc²) and therefore particles can be created or destroyed (at a cost of some amount of [energy]), so that the number of particles is no longer a [constant] in your theory. Therefore, if we want an accurate picture of quantum mechanics which obeys the laws of special relativity, it is necessary to change how we construct our theory. For example, when you turn on a light switch, you’re creating zillions of [photon|photons]. There is no theory in nonrelativistic quantum mechanics which can describe this.

Conceptually, what Quantum Field Theory does to solve this problem is it “combines” all Quantum theories with N particles, to get a general theory with all possible combinations of particles. Mathematically, it expands your [Hilbert Space] (the space of all possible quantum states with N particles) into a much bigger space, called [Fock Space], the space of all possible quantum states with any combination of the particles in your theory.

The cumbersome mathematics of Quantum Field Theory (e.g. [path integral|infinite-dimensional path integrals]) can be radically simplified by making use of what are known as [feynman diagram|Feynman diagrams]. A simple way of understanding a Feynman diagram is that it represents a possible [path] a system could take to get from one [configuration] to another. For example, for a [photon] to get from point a to point b, it might just go directly from a to b without doing anything, or it might split into an [electron] and a [positron], then the electron and positron could collide, annihilating one another, and producing another [photon], which propagates the rest of the way to point b. Or this electron-positron process could happen [twice]. These are three of the infinite possible diagrams which contribute to the process of the photon propagating from point a to point b.

a----------------b

a----<>---------b

a----<>---<>---b

For Feynman Diagrams that don’t look like [total crap], See Peskin & Schroeder’s An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory, or pretty much any textbook on the subject.

One interesting prediction Quantum Field Theory makes is the presence of [virtual particles], which appear and disappear out of nowhere; they require no [energy] cost to appear (i.e. they can violate [conservation of energy]), as long as they disappear sufficiently quickly. Feynman diagrams for these particles have no endpoints like the diagrams above; they appear only as a combination of connected [loops].

While quantum field theory has some problems ([regularization] and [renormalization] procedures generally have you adding and subtracting [infinity|infinities] in ways that would make most mathematicians [cookie monster|lose their cookies]), it has provided the most accurate and precise description of [particle physics] to date. If the quantum theory you’re studying is the [standard model], it is possible to accurately predict the [electromagnetic force], [strong nuclear force], and [weak nuclear force]. Generalizing to quantum field theory in [curved space|curved spacetime], it is possible to predict the interaction of said forces in an external [gravitational field], however a way has not yet been discovered to “quantize” this gravitational field properly, and so it must be considered as an external force, thus [graviton|gravitons] must still remain a mystery to particle physicists, at least until [string theory|string theorists] can shed some light on the subject.

quantum field theory (idea)