In category theory, a *functor* is what takes you from one category to another. If **X** and **Y** are categories, a functor ** F** from

**X**to

**Y**takes each node

*A*of

**X**to a node

*of*

**F**A**Y**, in such a way that if

*A*->

*B*then

*->*

**F**A*. That is, it preserves arrows!*

**F**B#### Examples:

- If
**X**is almost any category, it has a "forgetful functor" which copies every node*A*to the set*A*of its elements. For example, this lets you treat groups as just the sets of their elements, forgetting the special group structure defined on them. This functor is the basis of rp's assertion in his writeup under category theory that "nodes are sets". They're not, but we can usually think of them as sets by forgetting about their extra properties. - If
**A**is a category and**A**' a pointed category based on**A**, there is a slightly less forgetful functor from**A'**to**A**which takes (*A*,a) to*A*(it "forgets" about a). - The category
**Group**of groups has a nice functor from**Group**to**Group**which takes every group*G*to a group with exactly the same elements, but the operation takes the elements in opposite order. The groups which this functor takes to themselves are exactly the category of**Abelian groups**.

If you've just read category theory, you might recognise all of this as being very familiar. And it is! If you look at the Class of all categories (this is a really Big Object, which doesn't even exist in something as puny as Zermelo Fraenkel set theory!), you can create the

**Category**of all categories as follows: every category is a node, and the functors between categories are arrows! This lets you warp your mind with abstract nonsense. Beginners at category theory really like this, as it shows how fundamental category theory is: it even covers itself! It also makes set theorists nervous, as this is

*exactly*the territory the Barber paradox treads on...