Countries in general, and the USA
amongst them, tend to have the emotional maturity
of 5-year-olds: They’re petty
, they solve almost everything by fighting, and they have an almost ritualistic need for a great enemy. The US used to treat Iran
as the great devil, and now Iraq shares the title (note that we take it for granted that the Iranians treat the US as the great devil). But seriously, or should I say – aside of that:
The rise of what the US saw as the fundamentalist threat was never more apparent than during the Iranian Islamic revolution and the years that followed it. However, the communist block was still perceived as US’s major strategic enemy. The interests leading US policy in the region included the will to control middle-eastern oil, in addition to the will to spread a relatively democratically/capitalistically oriented regime (or at least an anti-communist regime) in as many countries as possible. The Iran-Iraq war was a sterling opportunity to back both sides, and thus both weaken their governments and win their support.
It’s interesting to notice that the soviet-union played a similar, yet more elaborate, trick during the 48 war – it voted for the establishment of a Jewish state in the UN, and proceeded to send Czechoslovakia to back Israel while it backed the Arab countries in the ensuing conflict. Had the USSR not backed the new state and made sure it stays a bone in the neck of oil producing countries, it would have never kept their support for so long.
Conclusion? Saddam Hussein is still a piece of Excrement, and the US government often has a foreign affair policy that would not please all democrats. So @#@$$%#$ what?