If you're
squeamish, don't read on, or look at any of the websites I reference. You WILL
regret it.
It should be noted that all
radioactive chemicals are teratogenic. But...how?
Well,
foetuses have
rapidly dividing cells. Cancer is a genetic
malformation in rapidly dividing cells, by definition. So, foetus cells can be affected by
radiation. Or not...once the foetus is past a certain age, you'll most likely be
OK, as the
genetic code for these dividing cells is more or less set.
But, if you get your genetic code messed up at a very
early stage, say at the
zygotal stage, where there's only a few cells, you will have problems.
Occasionally, the body will detect the
abnormality, quietly think "
Oh bugger" to itself and
miscarry the zygote. If not, there's all sorts of nasty
repercussions. Like the baby being
stillborn. And not only will it be stillborn, but because the genetics was mucked about with at such an early age, it will be grossly
deformed. The mother would probably have severe
psychological problems as a result of this.
And though it may be nasty to think about and quite
insensitive to say so,
biologically a foetus affected by a nuclear accident is essentially a tumour. It's
cancer taken up twenty-five notches. And it's common.
Chernobyl has had plenty of problems of this nature, as has
Mayak and other places affected by nuclear pollution. In Mayak there have been terrible problems because of local people bathing in
contaminated water. More information in the Mayak node or at
http://archive.greenpeace.org/mayak.