Many a student who has used the basics of algebra, and has solved `x + 6 = 2x + 1`

and other simple unknowns^{1} has encountered the concept of infinity, and assumed that the symbol `∞`

can be manipulated just like `x`

; and that since infinity cannot be enlarged upon by addition, Infinity plus one equals infinity. Then they tend to use that basis to make fake proofs of nonsense:

Step 1: `∞ + 1 = ∞`

Subtracting infinity from both sides, we get

Step 2: `1 = 0`

In general for any real numbers n and m,

Step 1: `∞ + n = ∞ + m`

so

step 2: `m = n`

Thus any number is equal to any other.

So is arithmetic broken?

Well, no. One is still not equal to zero. Adding up gives consistent results. The problem is that is the first step we assume that infinity does not have a fixed value – it is equal to itself plus one. In the second step we assume that it does have a fixed value – that it can be subtracted from both sides, leaving the equality relation intact. These assumptions are contradictory, and the results obtained may not be correct.

So which step is incorrect? Well, both:

1) It's widely believed that infinity plus one equals infinity, but it's an oversimplification. There is no real number that is equal to itself plus one - zero is the identity element for addition of real numbers, not one. Infinity is not a real number, so addition is not defined the same way upon it.

2) Likewise, subtraction is not defined upon it. The first step is a statement about infinity which has rhetorical force if not mathematical rigour. The second step is a false statement two real numbers.

1) x = 5