There is a problem with softlinking and the Last Node function which I thought was mine alone, but others have
confirmed seeing also. Essentially, every once in a while on my Safari browser, a node I've visited will get 'stuck' in the 'Last Node' value, being inserted into the search box in every node I go to, and softlinking every node I navigate to to it. This survives cache clears, reloading the browser, etc. etc. I suspect it is a malf involving cookie-based softlinking, but don't know enough about code to prove this.
As per the link above, WaldemarExkul has seen this with iCab, and Simulacron3 and I have seen it using Safari. It's really, really annoying, since I usually don't want to link every node I visit to A Polymer Wang: My Police Record and Me.
Well, okay, maybe I do want to link that, but it should be my choice, y'know? CAN'T A GUY HAVE ANY PRIVACY OVER WHAT NODES HE VISITS? /sobs
Update: Waldemar says that even if he turns off user-agent masquerading in iCab, it continues. I'm suspecting, then, that this is a Mac OS X thing rather than a Safari thing...?
NEW BUG REPORT:
Apparently there is an issue with handling orphaned brackets in Cream of the Cool. Recently, Aneurin's writeup MPs' Expenses and the Freedom of Information Act found its way to the top o the CoTC - and this caused problems. This was because in the first paragraph of the writeup there was an orphaned left bracket (where the White Paper link is now - the closing bracket was missing). As a result, when UpdateNodelet.pl (I think) ran to generate CoTC, it cut off the CoTC section just *before* that link, where the orphaned bracket was, and stuffed the whole rest of CoTC into the link for the News for Noders section title. As a result, the Nodelets bar (on the right side in many Zen themes) ended up stuffed at the bottom of the page, following the center column text, likely because the tags for the css got hosed.
I added a closing bracket to the White Paper link and things got shipshape again once the nodelet update ran.
Note: Is it possible that the single quote in the writeup title was a contributing factor?
Cheers.