The citizens of the world are...susceptible to the fundamental tendencies that characterize all members of our species. Cultural norms, traditions and experiences can, however, modify the weight brought to bear by each factor.

Consider the results of a report published this year by Standford University's Michael W. Morris, Joel M. Podolny and Sheira Ariel, who studied employees of Citibank, a multinational financial corporation. The researchers selected four societies for examination: the U.S., China, Spain and Germany. They surveyed Citibank branches within each country and measured employees' willingness to comply voluntarily with a request from a co-worker for assistance with a task. Although multiple key factors could come into play, the main reason employees felt obligated to comply differed in the four nations. Each of these reasons incorporated a different fundamental principle of social influence.

Employees in the U.S. took a reciprocation-based approach to the decision to comply. They asked the question, "What has this person done for me recently?" and felt obligated to volunteer if they owed the requester a favor. Chinese employees responded primarily to authority, in the form of loyalties to those of high status within their small group. They asked, "Is this requester connected to someone who is high-ranking?" If the answer was yes, they felt required to yield.

Spanish Citibank personnel based the decision mostly on liking/friendship. They were willing to help on the basis of friendship norms that encourage faithfulness to one's friends, regardless of position or status. They asked, "Is this requester connected to my friends?" If the answer was yes, they were especially likely to comply.

German employees were most compelled by consistency, offering assistance in order to be consistent with the rules of the organization. They decided whether to comply by asking, "According to official regulation and categories, am I supposed to assist this requester?" If the answer was yes, they felt a stong obligation to grant the request.

In sum, although all human societies seem to play by the same set of influence rules, the weights assigned to the various rules can differ across cultures. Persuasive appeals to audiences in distinct cultures need to take such differences into account.

-- Robert B. Cialdini
Scientific American

While it is true that cultures differ significantly on small, everyday scale problems like the one outlined in the previous writeup, wouldn't it be interesting if someone did a similar test base on ethical criterion for judgement rather than cultural?

Maybe cultures are just different ways of expressing some sort of basic underlying human moral code in different backgrounds?

After all we aren't all that different from each other. Do ethics depend primarily on culture? Or are they independent of cultural patterns and valid across the board?

Log in or register to write something here or to contact authors.