This self-centered, arrogant, hypocritical tirade is indicative of all that I find wrong with American society. "They're in prison, so they have to be horrible people, and don't deserve even the slightest human courtesy." Give me a f*#$ing break.
Let's just paint a nice little picture. Joe Brady is an upstanding citizen, but has a penchant for Drunk Driving. He of course gets caught (saw it coming... I know... but go with it). He gets sentenced to 2 years in jail (he's a repeat offender), or better yet, Joe appears before the judge when he's having a bad day. Now Joe has got a record, he's published in the local news paper, and spends some time in the slammer. Now he's totally screwed (yes, I am making a pun). And for his troubles, he get's diseases, and dies. But he's obviously a bad person, otherwise he wouldn't be in jail.
And what about parking tickets? Or tax evasion? Those are obviously hardened criminals that deserve no mercy.
If you have ever seen a jail, you know that we give them precious little decency to begin with. Talk to an inmate some time, not just some over nighter MIP, and your little world will be blown away. My guess is that this argument is espoused by some suburban spoiled kid (or at least mentally), with sociopathic tendancies.
Here's a novel idea (which I know the conservative people out there won't like), let's treat the person. Oh my god! I said it, that horrible idea that could never work because everyone in jail is worthless, and stupid, and won't ever change. They knew the consequences, they knew what jail was going to be like, but they're baaaaaaad. And this serves society how?
It's like some whole pedagogic power trip... the power of punishment! It will deter crime! If it works so well, why do we have the largest percentage of our population in jail in the entire world? (including China, which is saying somthing) We're obviously doing somthing wrong, maybe it's time to honestly reconsider our paradigms... I don't claim to have the answers, but this statement just shows how arrogant, and petty, and vendictive we have gotten.
K, I'm off my soap box... have a nice day.
If jailing more and more people were a tried and true solution, then why have we jailed more than 20 percent more people in NSW and we've got crime rates that are either growing or standing still? You'd think that with such a large increase in the prison population, we'd see a reduction in crime. We haven't. - chairman of the Select Committee, John Ryan
Pris"on [F., fr. L. prehensio, prensio, a seizing, arresting, fr. prehendre, prendere, to lay hold of, to seize. See Prehensile, and cf. Prize, n., Misprision.]
1.
A place where persons are confined, or restrained of personal liberty; hence, a place or state o confinement, restraint, or safe custody.
Bring my soul out of prison, that I may praise thy name. Ps. cxlii. 7.
The tyrant Aeolus, . . . With power imperial, curbs the struggling winds, And sounding tempests in dark prisons binds. Dryden.
2.
Specifically, a building for the safe custody or confinement of criminals and others committed by lawful authority.
Prison bars, ∨ Prison base. See Base, n., 24. -- Prison breach. Law See Note under 3d Escape, n., 4. -- Prison house, a prison. Shak. -- Prison ship Naut., a ship fitted up for the confinement of prisoners. -- Prison van, a carriage in which prisoners are conveyed to and from prison.
© Webster 1913.
Pris"on, v. t. [imp. & p. p. Prisoned (?); p. pr. & vb. n. Prisoning.]
To imprison; to shut up in, or as in, a prison; to confine; to restrain from liberty.
The prisoned eagle dies for rage. Sir W. Scott.
His true respect will prison false desire. Shak.
To bind (together); to enchain.
Sir William Crispyn with the duke was led Together prisoned. Robert of Brunne.
printable version chaos
Everything2 Help