A logical fallacy in which a definition includes items it shouldn't.

Example: "A car is a thing used for transportation." Well, so are roller skates.

To prove that the definition is too broad, identify the conditions in the definition and give an example of an item which fits the conditions but obviously isn't an instance of the term.

Y'know, if you log in, you can write something here, or contact authors directly on the site. Create a New User if you don't already have an account.