A well-known thesis put forth in the movie "Clerks," which states that, given the size of the Death Star, and the massive engineering feat which put it together, it must have been constructed mostly or entirely by private, non-Imperial contractors. While making no presumptions about the standing size of the Imperial army, one could probably assume that most of their soldiers were not trained in advanced space station construction, weapon systems construction, and the undoubtedly intricate infrastructure of such a facility. Thus, the Imperium would likely have bid the project out to a major military contractor with the experience, resources, and personnel needed to complete the job. The thesis presented in "Clerks" would suggest that those laborers, innocent civilians all, died needlessly every time the rebels blew up the Death Star.

However, like any modern-day military construction project, such as the construction of NORAD or the Pentagon, the workers are not entirely innocent. First, they would have some clue, however small, as to what they were building. At the very least, they could guess that their work was facilitating the United States government, or the Empire, or that they were working under a military contact. If they continued their work despite, or because, of that, they are facilitators. Unless the Imperium was using slave labor, of which there was never any mention, all workers and all contractors would have been free to quit, if they so chose. That being the case, no worker who contributed to the Death Star was any more innocent than a factory owner who made munitions for Nazi Germany, or a scientist who designed ICBMs or nuclear warheads for the U.S.

The Empire was in fact notorious for using slave labor. Most commonly the slaves would be conscripted from the 'lesser' species of nonhumans. Raids would be made against the homeworlds of some of these species, especially Kashyyyk, home planet of the Wookiees. Sometimes, though, humans, former citizens of the Empire, would be imprisoned for their political views and forced into slavery as well.

Actually, the construction of the Death Star Mk 1 is mentioned in one of the Jedi Academy trilogy books by Kevin J. Anderson, which is only "extended universe" canon, but there is no contradicting movie authority to suggest it is incorrect. In fact, the Death Star was constructed in orbit of the penal world Despayre, using the prisoners as slave labourers. When the construction was completed, the planet's atmosphere was so horribly damaged by the industry involved in the constrution effort, that it was no longer of any use. As such, Emperor Palpatine ordered the use of Despayre as a test of the Death Star's superlaser, with spectacular results.

Admittedly this doesn't prove that the same source of labour was used in the Death Star Mk 2, but I'd think that slave labour was being used again. Since the imperial fleet are clearly in control of construction (the admiral on the death star is held responsible by Darth Vader for the slow progress of construction), it presumably isn't being constructed by Seinar or any of the other major contractors, who typically managed construction work themselves. Also, if you were building a superweapon, being built as a successor to one destroyed largely due to espionage, would you bring in unknown civilians to do the job?

Therefore, sure, the work crews were "innocent" and working against their will, but most of them are criminals anyway, so they have it coming....

No more writeups are being accepted for this node. If you feel you have something to add to this node, post it on your Scratch Pad and contact an editor.