A logical fallacy in which an argument to prove one thing actually proves something else. If the argument is extremely long and boring, many people wouldn't notice.

Example: "You should vote for J. Random Politician! Both George "W" Bush and Al Gore are beholden to large evil corporations for campaign contributions!" Maybe so, but you haven't proven why i should vote for J. Random, just that the other two suck.

To prove the conclusion irrelevant, show that the conclusion proved is not the one stated.

Log in or registerto write something here or to contact authors.