Which
matters not. Since we are presumably speaking of
rational debate, this means the
burden of proof is on the one who makes the
claim. Meaning, of course, one must point to
evidence that some sort of
god exists. (Reasons for why this is so can be found easily enough in any textbook on debating, if not
Everything itself.)
This is not to say the above is untrue, but simply irrelevant. Nor is it to imply I deny the possibility of a god. Although if it does nothing, I would say that a difference that makes no difference is no difference.