Back to Chapter Listing
The government and religion of Persia have deserved some notice, from their connection with the decline and fall of the Roman
empire. We shall occasionally mention the Scythian or Samaritan tribes, * which, with their arms and horses, their flocks and herds, their wives and families, wandered over the immense plains which spread themselves from the Caspian Sea to the
Vistula, from the confines of Persia to those of Germany. But the warlike Germans, who first resisted, then invaded, and at
length overturned the Western monarchy of Rome, will occupy a much more important place in this history, and possess a
stronger, and, if we may use the expression, a more domestic, claim to our attention and regard. The most civilized nations of
modern Europe issued from the woods of Germany; and in the rude institutions of those barbarians we may still distinguish the
original principles of our present laws and manners. In their primitive state of simplicity and independence, the Germans were
surveyed by the discerning eye, and delineated by the masterly pencil, of Tacitus, * the first of historians who applied the
science of philosophy to the study of facts. The expressive conciseness of his descriptions has served to exercise the diligence
of innumerable antiquarians, and to excite the genius and penetration of the philosophic historians of our own times. The
subject, however various and important, has already been so frequently, so ably, and so successfully discussed, that it is now
grown familiar to the reader, and difficult to the writer. We shall therefore content ourselves with observing, and indeed with
repeating, some of the most important circumstances of climate, of manners, and of institutions, which rendered the wild
barbarians of Germany such formidable enemies to the Roman power.
Footnote *: The Scythians, even according to the ancients, are not Samarians. It may be doubted whether Gibbon intended to confound them. - M.
The Greeks, after having divided the world into Greeks and barbarians. divided the barbarians into four
great classes, the Celts, the Scythians, the Indians, and the Ethiopians. They called Celts all the inhabitants of Gaul. Scythia
extended from the Baltic Sea to the Lake Aral: the people enclosed in the angle to the north-east, between Celtica and Scythia,
were called Celto- Scythians, and the Sarmatians were placed in the southern part of that angle. But these names of Celts, of
Scythians, of Celto-Scythians, and Sarmatians, were invented, says Schlozer, by the profound cosmographical ignorance of the
Greeks, and have no real ground; they are purely geographical divisions, without any relation to the true affiliation of the
different races. Thus all the inhabitants of Gaul are called Celts by most of the ancient writers; yet Gaul contained three totally
distinct nations, the Belgae, the Aquitani, and the Gauls, properly so called.
Footnote *: The Germania of Tacitus has been a fruitful source of hypothesis to the ingenuity of modern writers, who have endeavored to account for the form of the work and the views of the author. According to Luden, (Geschichte des T. V. i.
432, and note,) it contains the unfinished and disarranged for a larger work. - M.
Ancient Germany, excluding from its independent limits the province westward of the Rhine, which had submitted to the Roman
yoke, extended itself over a third part of Europe. 1 Almost the whole of modern Germany, Denmark, Norway, Sweden,
Finland, Livonia, Prussia, and the greater part of Poland, were peopled by the various tribes of one great nation, whose
complexion, manners, and language denoted a common origin, and preserved a striking resemblance. On the west, ancient
Germany was divided by the Rhine from the Gallic, and on the south, by the Danube, from the Illyrian, provinces of the empire.
A ridge of hills, rising from the Danube, and called the Carpathian Mountains, covered Germany on the side of Dacia or
Hungary. The eastern frontier was faintly marked by the mutual fears of the Germans and the Sarmatians, and was often
confounded by the mixture of warring and confederating tribes of the two nations. In the remote darkness of the north, the
ancients imperfectly descried a frozen ocean that lay beyond the Baltic Sea, and beyond the Peninsula, or islands 1 of
Footnote 1: Germany was not of such vast extent. It is from Caesar, and more particularly from Ptolemy, (says Gatterer,) that we can know what was the state of ancient Germany before the wars with the Romans had changed the positions of the tribes. Germany, as changed by these wars, has been described by Strabo, Pliny, and Tacitus. Germany, properly so called, was bounded on the west by the Rhine, on the east by the Vistula, on the north by the southern point of Norway, by Sweden, and
Estonia. On the south, the Maine and the mountains to the north of Bohemia formed the limits. Before the time of Caesar, the
country between the Maine and the Danube was partly occupied by the Helvetians and other Gauls, partly by the Hercynian
forest but, from the time of Caesar to the great migration, these boundaries were advanced as far as the Danube, or, what is the
same thing, to the Suabian Alps, although the Hercynian forest still occupied, from north to south, a space of nine days' journey
on both banks of the Danube. The German tribes called themselves, from very remote times, by the generic name of Teutons, (Teuten, Deutschen,) which Tacitus derives from that of one of their gods, Tuisco. It appears more probable that it means merely men, people. Many savage nations have given themselves no other name. Thus the Laplanders call themselves Almag, people; the Samoiedes Nilletz, Nissetsch, men, &c. As to the name of Germans, (Germani,) Caesar found it in use in Gaul, and adopted it as a word already known to the Romans. Many of the learned (from a passage of Tacitus, de Mor Germ. c. 2) have supposed that it was only applied to the Teutons after Caesar's time; but Adelung has triumphantly refuted this opinion. The name of Germans is
found in the Fasti Capitolini. See Gruter, Iscrip. 2899, in which the consul Marcellus, in the year of Rome 531, is said to have
defeated the Gauls, the Insubrians, and the Germans, commanded by Virdomar. See Adelung, Aelt. Geschichte der Deutsch,
p. 102. - Compressed from G.
Some ingenious writers 2 have suspected that Europe was much colder formerly than it is at present; and the most ancient
descriptions of the climate of Germany tend exceedingly to confirm their theory. The general complaints of intense frost and
eternal winter, are perhaps little to be regarded, since we have no method of reducing to the accurate standard of the
thermometer, the feelings, or the expressions, of an orator born in the happier regions of Greece or Asia. But I shall select two
remarkable circumstances of a less equivocal nature. 1. The great rivers which covered the Roman provinces, the Rhine and the
Danube, were frequently frozen over, and capable of supporting the most enormous weights. The barbarians, who often chose
that severe season for their inroads, transported, without apprehension or danger, their numerous armies, their cavalry, and their
heavy wagons, over a vast and solid bridge of ice. 3 Modern ages have not presented an instance of a like phenomenon. 2.
The reindeer, that useful animal, from whom the savage of the North derives the best comforts of his dreary life, is of a
constitution that supports, and even requires, the most intense cold. He is found on the rock of Spitzberg, within ten degrees of
the Pole; he seems to delight in the snows of Lapland and Siberia: but at present he cannot subsist, much less multiply, in any
country to the south of the Baltic. 4 In the time of Caesar the reindeer, as well as the elk and the wild bull, was a native of the
Hercynian forest, which then overshadowed a great part of Germany and Poland. 5 The modern improvements sufficiently
explain the causes of the diminution of the cold. These immense woods have been gradually cleared, which intercepted from the
earth the rays of the sun. 6 The morasses have been drained, and, in proportion as the soil has been cultivated, the air has
become more temperate. Canada, at this day, is an exact picture of ancient Germany. Although situated in the same parallel with the finest provinces of France and England, that country experiences the most rigorous cold. The reindeer are very
numerous, the ground is covered with deep and lasting snow, and the great river of St. Lawrence is regularly frozen, in a season
when the waters of the Seine and the Thames are usually free from ice. 7
Footnote 2: In particular, Mr. Hume, the Abbe du Bos, and M. Pelloutier. Hist. des Celtes, tom. i.
Footnote 3: On the banks of the Danube, the wine, when brought to table, was frequently frozen into great lumps, frusta vini. Ovid. Epist. ex Ponto, l. iv. 7, 9, 10. Virgil. Georgic. l. iii. 355. The fact is confirmed by a soldier and a philosopher, who had experienced the intense cold of Thrace. See Xenophon, Anabasis, l. vii. p. 560, edit. Hutchinson. Note: The Danube is constantly frozen over. At Pesth the bridge is usually taken up, and the traffic and communication between the two banks carried on over the ice. The Rhine is likewise in many parts passable at least two years out of five. Winter campaigns are so unusual, in modern warfare, that I recollect but one instance of an army crossing either river on the ice. In the thirty years' war, (1635,) Jan van Werth, an Imperialist partisan, crossed the Rhine from Heidelberg on the ice with 5000 men, and surprised Spiers. Pichegru's memorable campaign, (1794-5,) when the freezing of the Meuse and Waal opened Holland to his conquests, and his cavalry and artillery attacked the ships frozen in, on the Zuyder Zee, was in a winter of unprecedented severity. - M. 1845.
Footnote 4: Buffon, Histoire Naturelle, tom. xii. p. 79, 116.
Footnote 5: Caesar de Bell. Gallic. vi. 23, &c. The most inquisitive of the Germans were ignorant of its utmost limits, although some of them had traveled in it more than sixty days' journey.
Footnote 6: Cluverius (Germania Antiqua, l. iii. c. 47) investigates the small and scattered remains of the
Footnote 7: Charlevoix, Histoire du Canada.
It is difficult to ascertain, and easy to exaggerate, the influence of the climate of ancient Germany over the minds and bodies of
the natives. Many writers have supposed, and most have allowed, though, as it should seem, without any adequate proof, that
the rigorous cold of the North was favorable to long life and generative vigor, that the women were more fruitful, and the human
species more prolific, than in warmer or more temperate climates. 8 We may assert, with greater confidence, that the keen air of Germany formed the large and masculine limbs of the natives, who were, in general, of a more lofty stature than the people of
the South, 9 gave them a kind of strength better adapted to violent exertions than to patient labor, and inspired them with
constitutional bravery, which is the result of nerves and spirits. The severity of a winter campaign, that chilled the courage of the
Roman troops, was scarcely felt by these hardy children of the North, 10 who, in their turn, were unable to resist the summer
heats, and dissolved away in languor and sickness under the beams of an Italian sun. 11
Footnote 8: Olaus Rudbeck asserts that the Swedish women often bear ten or twelve children, and not uncommonly twenty or thirty; but the authority of Rudbeck is much to be suspected.
Footnote 9: In hos artus, in haec corpora, quae miramur, excrescunt. Taeit Germania, 3, 20. Cluver. l. i. c. 14.
Footnote 10: Plutarch. in Mario. The Cimbri, by way of amusement, often did down mountains of snow on their broad shields.
Footnote 11: The Romans made war in all climates, and by their excellent discipline were in a great measure preserved in health and vigor. It may be remarked, that man is the only animal which can live and multiply in every country from the equator to the poles. The hog seems to approach the nearest to our species in that privilege.
There is not any where upon the globe a large tract of country, which we have discovered destitute of inhabitants, or whose first
population can be fixed with any degree of historical certainty. And yet, as the most philosophic minds can seldom refrain from
investigating the infancy of great nations, our curiosity consumes itself in toilsome and disappointed efforts. When Tacitus
considered the purity of the German blood, and the forbidding aspect of the country, he was disposed to pronounce those
barbarians Indigence, or natives of the soil. We may allow with safety, and perhaps with truth, that ancient Germany was not
originally peopled by any foreign colonies already formed into a political society; 12 but that the name and nation received
their existence from the gradual union of some wandering savages of the Hercynian woods. To assert those savages to have
been the spontaneous production of the earth which they inhabited would be a rash inference, condemned by religion, and
unwarranted by reason.
Footnote 12: Facit. Germ. c. 3. The emigration of the Gauls followed the course of the Danube, and
discharged itself on Greece and Asia. Tacitus could discover only one inconsiderable tribe that retained any traces of a Gallic
origin. Note: The Gothini, who must not be confounded with the Gothi, a Suevian tribe. In the time of Caesar many other tribes of
Gaulish origin dwelt along the course of the Danube, who could not long resist the attacks of the Suevi. The Helvetians, who
dwelt on the borders of the Black Forest, between the Maine and the Danube, had been expelled long before the time of
Caesar. He mentions also the Volci Tectosagi, who came from Languedoc and settled round the Black Forest. The Boii, who
had penetrated into that forest, and also have left traces of their name in Bohemia, were subdued in the first century by the
Marcomanni. The Boii settled in Noricum, were mingled afterwards with the Lombards, and received the name of Boio Arii
(Bavaria) or Boiovarii: var, in some German dialects, appearing to mean remains, descendants. Compare Malte B-m,
Geography, vol. i. p. 410, edit 1832 - M.
Such rational doubt is but ill suited with the genius of popular vanity. Among the nations who have adopted the Mosaic history
of the world, the ark of Noah has been of the same use, as was formerly to the Greeks and Romans the siege of Troy. On a
narrow basis of acknowledged truth, an immense but rude superstructure of fable has been erected; and the wild Irishman, 13 as well as the wild Tartar, 14 could point out the individual son of Japhet, from whose loins his ancestors were lineally descended. The last century abounded with antiquarians of profound learning and easy faith, who, by the dim light of legends and traditions, of conjectures and etymologies, conducted the great grandchildren of Noah from the Tower of Babel to the
extremities of the globe. Of these judicious critics, one of the most entertaining was Oaus Rudbeck, professor in the university
of Upsal. 15 Whatever is celebrated either in history or fable, this zealous patriot ascribes to his country. From Sweden
(which formed so considerable a part of ancient Germany) the Greeks themselves derived their alphabetical characters, their
astronomy, and their religion. Of that delightful region (for such it appeared to the eyes of a native) the Atlantis of Plato, the
country of the Hyperboreans, the gardens of the Hesperides, the Fortunate Islands, and even the Elysian Fields, were all but
faint and imperfect transcripts. A clime so profusely favored by Nature could not long remain desert after the flood. The learned
Rudbeck allows the family of Noah a few years to multiply from eight to about twenty thousand persons. He then disperses
them into small colonies to replenish the earth, and to propagate the human species. The German or Swedish detachment
(which marched, if I am not mistaken, under the command of Askenaz, the son of Gomer, the son of Japhet) distinguished itself
by a more than common diligence in the prosecution of this great work. The northern hive cast its swarms over the greatest part
of Europe, Africa, and Asia; and (to use the author's metaphor) the blood circulated from the extremities to the heart.
Footnote 13: According to Dr. Keating, (History of Ireland, p. 13, 14,) the giant Portholanus, who was the son of Seara, theson of Esra, the son of Sru, the son of Framant, the son of Fathaclan, the son of Magog, the son of Japhet, the son of Noah, landed on the coast of Munster the 14th day of May, in the year of the world one thousand nine hundred and seventy-eight.
Though he succeeded in his great enterprise, the loose behavior of his wife rendered his domestic life very unhappy, and
provoked him to such a degree, that he killed - her favorite greyhound. This, as the learned historian very properly observes,
was the first instance of female falsehood and infidelity ever known in Ireland.
Footnote 14: Genealogical History of the Tartars, by Abulghazi Bahadur Khan.
Footnote 15: His work, entitled Atlantica, is uncommonly scarce. Bayle has given two most curious extracts from it. Republique des Lettres Janvier et Fevrier, 1685.
Back to Chapter Listing
To cite original text:
Gibbon, Edward, 1737-1794. The history of the decline and fall of the Roman Empire. 1st ed. (London : Printed for W. Strahan ; and T. Cadell, 1776-1788.), pp. 217-221.