i is the square root of -1, an imaginary number. used in the complex plane, which is made up of complex numbers (complex numbers have a real and an imaginary part).

The lowercase i was often used by E. E. Cummings for personal reference. This persona he created represented the individual, someone who does not conform, is unappreciated, and powerless. However, the individual's ability to think and feel allows them to see the fallacies in society's thinking, and to denounce the pretensions of authority.

I am the square root of -1, an imaginary number. used in the complex plane, which is made up of complex numbers (complex numbers have a real and an imaginary part).



This imaginary writeup about myself is presented with due apologies to rescdsk; the edb made me do it.

As it was explained to me multiple times, at length on the long and treacherous road to my Bachelor of Mathematics degree:

'i' is not the square root of negative one. The square root of negative one is undefined, as the square root operation cannot be applied to numbers less than zero.

'i' is defined as a number with the property

i 2 = -1

Calling it imaginary and saying it's the square root of negative one really annoyed profs at the University of Waterloo, who clearly needed to get out more often.

Most electrical engineers tend to prefer j to i as notation for the square root of negative one.

Also, i (or j if you prefer) is equal to exp(i*pi/2). This is easily derived from Euler's formula: exp(i*theta) = cos(theta) + i*sin(theta).

i as a variable of choice for traversing arrays

i, typically lower case, is typically used to traverse arrays in most of the computer programming languages in use today. Most notably C. And because of syntactical and learning curve relations, also C++, and Java.

Although various other variable names like - 'index'. 'counter', 'count' etc. are also invariably used, but even in projects with most well followed coding guidelines (which normally forbid defining any variable with name containing less than three characters), programmers feel comfortable only when using 'i' as an array subscript.

For multidimensional arrays or for two array traversals, 'j', 'k' 'l' etc. are commonly used.

This, it should be noted, is not without a reason.

The reasons for such uses are historical and date back to the times when FORTRAN was the language of a real programmer.

In FORTRAN, (specially the original one) one never needed to declare any variables, any variable with name starting with alphabets between (and including) 'I' and 'N' were integers by default. Similar alphabetical limits were defined for floats etc.

Thus, a programmer requiring an integer would typically start from 'I' and go on.

As most of initial C language programmers were proficient in Fortran, they naturally started by using 'i', 'j', 'k' etc. as the variables of choice for traversing the arrays.

Sidebar in an imaginary high school textbook on imaginary numbers:

What is i?

I don’t want to get into this horrible, difficult question right now. One time I was teaching a group of precocious young fiends who asked me this question over and over until I had to hide under my desk. There they surrounded me, and all I could do was plead with them that i was that peculiar thing that multiplies and adds just like other numbers (associatively, commutatively, and distributively), but when you square it the answer is -1. But they all just shrieked back at me, “That doesn’t tell us what i is at all!”—except for one little monster who just kept screaming, “Why?” Just when I had decided to dash my brains out against the underside of the desk, the principal of the school walked in and swiftly settled the matter. “Look,” he said, casting an authoritative glance about the room, “Mr. Smith’s answer may not have addressed your question, but it has told you all you need to know in order to get the right answers on the Exam, and that is all Mr. Smith is here for—to tell you how to get the right answers on the Exam. Any questions that do not pertain to getting the right answers on the Exam, you can ask me in my office, after school hours. But you will please not bother Mr. Smith anymore with it.” He then lifted me from under the desk, installed me back at the podium, whispered something encouraging in my ear, and left the classroom. I felt a bit shaky through the rest of the period, but at least the kids had shut up. —As should you.

The configuration of 90 billion neurons in my brain, when interacting with another brain which asserts that humans have "physical" aspects and "mental" aspects that produce consciousness, or the few other models, does not transition to a configuration that asserts that.

Neither is it compatible with a configuration that represents understanding how the smart humans who espouse such opinions can possibly do so.

For a long time, it was the common thought that there was a little man/demon/something inside our head that was using our senses and thinking for us; it was what we meant when we referred to ourself. The little man was called a homunculus. How that wasn't rejected by the first six year old that heard it, based on the obvious infinite regression problem, is incomprehensible to me. Nonetheless, as we learned more, that idea was tossed on the trash heap.

All of the arguments these people are making about consciousness indirectly boil down to a homunculus. How they can't see that, I don't know.

As Pierre Laplace is apocryphally said to have replied to Napoleon when asked why there was no mention of God in his writings about the world, "I had no need of that hypothesis". All that is needed is to treat consciousness as an emergent behavior of an ungodly number of neurons. They wonder what it means to say "I see a red car". Why, it means that your brain configuration reacted to inputs that it sorted as "car" and "red", and your neural network was reconfigured to indicate that you are again seeing what you've seen in the past. The "I" in that thought need not be ascribed to any process other than that of your neural machinery.

And when you die? You just … stop.

294 words for Brevity Quest 2024

I (i).

1.

I, the ninth letter of the English alphabet, takes its form from the Phenician, through the Latin and the Greek. The Phenician letter was probably of Egyptian origin. Its original value was nearly the same as that of the Italian I, or long e as in mete. Etymologically I is most closely related to e, y, j, g; as in dint, dent, beverage, L. bibere; E. kin, AS. cynn; E. thin, AS. ynne; E. dominion, donjon, dungeon.

In English I has two principal vowel sounds: the long sound, as in pine, ice; and the short sound, as in pin. It has also three other sounds: (a) That of e in term, as in thirst. (b) That of e in mete (in words of foreign origin), as in machine, pique, regime. (c) That of consonant y (in many words in which it precedes another vowel), as in bunion, million, filial, Christian, etc. It enters into several digraphs, as in fail, field, seize, feign. friend; and with o often forms a proper diphtong, as in oil, join, coin.

See Guide to Pronunciation, §§ 98-106.

The dot which we place over the small or lower case i dates only from the 14th century. The sounds of I and J were originally represented by the same character, and even after the introduction of the form J into English dictionaries, words containing these letters were, till a comparatively recent time, classed together.

2.

In our old authors, I was often used for ay (or aye), yes, which is pronounced nearly like it.

3.

As a numeral, I stands for 1, II for 2, etc.

 

© Webster 1913.


I (?), pron. [poss. My (?) or Mine (); object. Me (?). pl. nom. We (); poss. Our (?) or Ours (); object. Us (?).] [OE. i, ich, ic, AS. ic; akin to OS. & D. ik, OHG. ih, G. ich, Icel. ek, Dan. jeg, Sw. jag, Goth. ik, OSlav. az', Russ. ia, W. i, L. ego, Gr. , , Skr. aham. &root;179. Cf. Egoism.]

The nominative case of the pronoun of the first person; the word with which a speaker or writer denotes himself.

 

© Webster 1913.

Log in or register to write something here or to contact authors.