Why time appears to speed up with age (idea)
|In a groundbreaking [article], [T. L. Freeman] discusses the
relationship between actual age and effective
age1. His conclusion is that the passing of the years
goes faster as we grow older. This makes sense; for instance when you
are 10 years of [age], a year represents 10% of your [life], and seems like
a very long time. However, when you are 50 years old, one year has
reduced to only 2% of your life, and hence seems only one-fifth as long.
Summarizing this work, Freeman comes to the conclusion that the actual age (AA) needs to be corrected for the [apparent] length of a year (AY). The apparent length of a year is inversely proportional to one person's actual age:
The constant of proportionality α is rather [loosely] defined by Freeman as the age at which a year really seems to last a year, and it was [arbitrarily] set at 20 years (α=20).
Now Freeman determines the concept of Effective age, which is simply the integral over time of the Apparent Year from age 1 to the actual age (AA) of interest:
AA AA EA = ∫ AY d(AA) = ∫ 20/AA d(AA) = 20 ln(AA) 1 1Although this formula results in some interesting conclusions, there are several [flaws] with this concept. As mentioned above, the choice of the proportionality constant is rather [arbitrary]. There is no rational justification for the choice of this age, but it was solely chosen based on Freeman's own perception of (the passing of) time. Next, the evaluation of the integral seems incorrect, since its lower limit was set at 1, and not at 0. Obviously, the choice of zero as lower integration boundary yields can not be evaluated due to the [logarithmic] term in the expression. Because of the obvious problems with Freeman's concept of time [perception], it is necessary to redefine the Effective Age on a sounder basis.
In the traditional concept of time perception, one person's Actual Age is proportional to the passing of time (t).
AA = βt + γ
Note the occurrence of two parameters β and γ that are traditionally set to one and zero, respectively. However, each has a clear (though usually [underappreciated]) function in time perception. The β-parameter describes the rate at which one person ages; some persons remain annoying little crybabies during their life, while others become boring old farts at 20. The γ-parameter describes the [origin] of one person's time perception. Did you ever meet those proud parents boasting about their little one who is only x months old, and already walks, writes [obfuscated C], or recently sold his first [dot.com]? No, these youngsters aren't [bright] for their age; they simply have a high γ-factor.
It is clear that with this definition, one person's Actual Age may already be non-synchronous with time. However, analogous to Freeman's work, the apparent length of a year (AY) is not constant:
AY= α/AA = α/(βt + γ)We can remove one of the parameters by defining two parameters δ and ε.
AY= α/(βt + γ) = (α/β)/(t + γ/β) = δ/(t + ε)The actual values of δ and ε will become clear from the [boundary conditions].
In order to obtain the Effective Age, the integral of AY is evaluated. Note that the integral is evaluated over [time], and not over Actual Age, since AA is a function of time:
t t EA = ∫ AY d(t) = ∫ δ/(t + ε) d(t) 0 0 EA = δ ln(t + ε) - δ ln(ε)The lower boundary condition (t=0) should yield an Effective Age of zero years (EA=0). Therefore ε = 1.
The upper boundary is less apparent. It should be chosen so that at t=tmax, EA = t. At death, the Effective Age and real time are again equal. However, no person knows for sure his or her personal [life expectancy]. This is clearly an issue for [molecular biologists] to address. However, if we assume for a person a [life expectancy] of 80 years (t=80, EA=80), we obtain:
δ = 80/ln(81) 80 ln(t + 1) EA = ---------- ln(81)This formula can now be used to calculate the Effective Age (and the Effective percentage Completion of Life) as a function of time. This is shown in the following table:
time (yrs.) EA (yrs.) Life% 0 0.0 0 1 12.6 16 2 20.0 25 3 25.2 32 4 29.3 37 5 32.6 41 10 43.7 55 15 50.5 63 20 55.4 69 30 62.5 78 40 67.6 85 50 71.6 89 60 74.8 94 70 77.6 97 80 80.0 100
And thus, the bold statement in the title is [justified]. Life is half over at age ten, and three quarters over at age thirty. Note the rapid increase at very young ages: in the initial stages of life, life itself makes big strides forward. For instance, consider the concepts of [speech], [eating] and [walking]; skills that are learned at a young age and are carried on throughout a person's life.
Another interesting observation that we can make is the age at which one year really seems to last one year. This can be calculated quite easily from the derivation above. For a [life expectancy] of 80 years, it is equal to 80/ ln(81) - 1 = 17.2 years. Quite close to Freeman's original assumption of 20 years.
Consequences:The concept of Effective Age has far stretching implications. Some of these I have summarized below:
[T. L. Freeman], [Why it's later than you think], [The Journal of Irreproducible Results|J. Irr. Res.], 1983.