Oh, Lord. Here they go again.
Let's see if I've got this right:
"no indication of heads, tails, muscles, organs, circulatory or digestive systems"
Is that correct? These alleged "remains" show no indication whatsoever of having been living organisms. In fact, they resemble air mattresses more than anything else. Yet we are told -- ordered, in fact -- by the High Priests of the Church of Evolution to believe that they are the remains of animals!
Can you please explain just exactly why our dear friends in the Church of Evolution saw fit -- in their godlike wisdom -- to declare these nondescript little rock formations to have been a form of animate life? I don't follow the "science" (so-called) news very closely, so you'll have to help me out here: Are air mattresses now being defined as "animals"? This would be in tune with the other craven diktats of the "scientific establishment", like for example their declaration that homosexuals are not perverts, but rather people who have "freely" "chosen" a "lifestyle". I'm also reminded of the leftist orthodoxy which redefines human babies as bodily excretions, like mucus.
In the silly-putty world of secular humanism, anything is possible. Truth is just a subjective convenience, to be changed and mutilated at will.
Are you tired of their lies yet? If you are, here's a quick explanation of these so-called "animals": They're rocks, pure and simple. Just rocks. Like the "dinosaur bones", like the "giant prehistoric fish", like the fiendishly toothy Archaeopteryx, like all the rest: Just rocks.