One is almost tempted to say "socialisms," for philosophies from Anarchism to Marxism to Social Democracy claim to be socialist. It is the favored definition of G.D.H. Cole, a Guild Socialist, that I usually employ: "democracy and the classless society."

Socialism generally implies that those who labor will democratically control the means of production and the fruits of their own labor. By this logic, one cannot say that many of the states that claimed to be socialistic were; for the factories and industry were not controlled by the workers, even indirectly through a democratic mechanism.

But who am I to say what socialism is? Does it seem sectarian? The term has been used and abused by so many that it has lost much meaning.

Of course, YMMV.