On /. today in a post responding to 42 ways to distribute the DeCSS source someone suggested calculating pi out to the point where it equals the ASCII values of the DeCSS source code. As pi is infinite, the string is in there somewhere.

Couldn't just about all copyright be circumvented this way? I can see it now. "This little piece of pi equals the ASCII value of Stephen King's new novel." etc... Because pi is universally accepted as infinite, couldn't you just say "Trust me, it's in there somewhere"? Then put the burden of proving you wrong (and that pi is finite) on the copyright holder.

Basically I take the view that all works are "plagarized" from pi.

The claim that pi contains every (finite) sequence of digits is phrased technically as pi is normal. Unfortunately, this is not known to be true. So we don't even know that the deCSS source code is "hidden" in there somewhere.

Note, however, that there is no compression with this scheme. Holding all 10100 100-digit sequences will require at least the first 10100+99 digits of pi (in practice you'll likely need more, as some sequences may be repeated), and so you'll need a >100-digit number as the index to find your chosen number. So it's hard to claim that the index into pi is not an encoding of your program, just like ASCII is an encoding of it.

Log in or registerto write something here or to contact authors.