Back to Chapter Listing
The progress of Christianity was not confined to the Roman empire; and according to the
primitive fathers, who interpret facts by prophecy, the new religion, within a century after the death of its divine Author, had
already visited every part of the globe. "There exists not," says Justin Martyr, "a people, whether Greek or Barbarian, or any other
race of men, by whatsoever appellation or manners they may be distinguished, however ignorant of arts or agriculture, whether
they dwell under tents, or wander about in covered wagons, among whom prayers are not offered up in the name of a crucified
Jesus to the Father and Creator of all things." 177 But this splendid exaggeration, which even at present it would be extremely
difficult to reconcile with the real state of mankind, can be considered only as the rash sally of a devout but careless writer, the
measure of whose belief was regulated by that of his wishes. But neither the belief nor the wishes of the fathers can alter the
truth of history. It will still remain an undoubted fact, that the barbarians of Scythe and Germany, who afterwards subverted the
Roman monarchy, were involved in the darkness of paganism; and that even the conversion of Iberian, of Armenia, or of Ethiopia,
was not attempted with any degree of success till the scepter was in the hands of an orthodox emperor. 178 Before that time, the
various accidents of war and commerce might indeed diffuse an imperfect knowledge of the gospel among the tribes of Caledonia,
179 and among the borders of the Rhine, the Danube, and the Euphrates. 180 Beyond the last-mentioned river, Edessa was distinguished by a firm and early adherence to the faith. 181 From Odessa the principles of Christianity were easily introduced
into the Greek and Syrian cities which obeyed the successors of Artaxerxes; but they do not appear to have made any deep
impression on the minds of the Persians, whose religious system, by the labors of a well disciplined order of priests, had been
constructed with much more art and solidity than the uncertain mythology of Greece and Rome. 182
Footnote 177: Justin Martyr, Dialog. cum Tryphon. p. 341. Irenaeus adv. Haeres. l. i. c. 10. Tertullian adv. Jud. c. 7. See
Mosheim, p. 203.
Footnote 178: See the fourth century of Mosheim's History of the Church. Many, though very confused
circumstances, that relate to the conversion of Iberia and Armenia, may be found in Moses of Chorene, l. ii. c. 78 - 89. Note:
Mons. St. Martin has shown that Armenia was the first nation that embraced Christianity. Memoires sur l'Armenie, vol. i. p. 306,
and notes to Le Beae.
Footnote 179: According to Tertullian, the Christian faith had penetrated into parts of Britain inaccessible to the Roman arms. About a century afterwards, Ossian, the son of Fingal, is said to have disputed, in his extreme old age, with one of the foreign
missionaries, and the dispute is still extant, in verse, and in the Erse language. See Mr. Macpher son's Dissertation on the Antiquity
of Ossian's Poems, p. 10.
Footnote 180: The Goths, who ravaged Asia in the reign of Gallienus, carried away great numbers of captives; some of whom
were Christians, and became missionaries. See Tillemont, Memoires Ecclesiast. tom. iv. p. 44.
Footnote 181: The legends of
Abgarus, fabulous as it is, affords a decisive proof, that many years before Eusebius wrote his history, the greatest part of the
inhabitants of Edessa had embraced Christianity. Their rivals, the citizens of Carrhae, adhered, on the contrary, to the cause of
Paganism, as late as the sixth century.
Footnote 182: According to Bardesanes (ap. Euseb. Praepar. Evangel.) there were some Christians in Persia before the end of the second century. In the time of Constantine (see his epistle to Sapor, Vit. l. iv. c. 13) they composed a flourishing church.
Consult Beausobre, Hist. Cristique du Manicheisme, tom. i. p. 180, and the Bibliotheca Orietalis of Assemani.
From this impartial though imperfect survey of the progress of Christianity, it may perhaps seem probable, that the number of its
proselytes has been excessively magnified by fear on the one side, and by devotion on the other. According to the irreproachable
testimony of Origen, 183 the proportion of the faithful was very inconsiderable, when compared with the multitude of an
unbelieving world; but, as we are left without any distinct information, it is impossible to determine, and it is difficult even to
conjecture, the real numbers of the primitive Christians. The most favorable calculation, however, that can be deduced from the
examples of Antioch and of Rome, will not permit us to imagine that more than a themselves under the banner of the cross before
the important conversion of Constantine. But their habits of faith, of zeal, and of union, seemed to multiply their numbers; and the
same causes which contributed to their future increase, served to render their actual strength more apparent and more formidable.
Footnote 183: Origen contra Celsum, l. viii. p. 424.
Such is the constitution of civil society, that whilst a few persons are distinguished by riches, by honors, and by knowledge, the
body of the people is condemned to obscurity, ignorance and poverty. The Christian religion, which addressed itself to the whole
human race, must consequently collect a far greater number of proselytes from the lower than from the superior ranks of life. This
innocent and natural circumstance has been improved into a very odious imputation, which seems to be less strenuously denied by
the apologists, than it is urged by the adversaries, of the faith; that the new sect of Christians was almost entirely composed of the
dregs of the populace, of peasants and mechanics, of boys and women, of beggars and slaves, the last of whom might sometimes
introduce the missionaries into the rich and noble families to which they belonged. These obscure teachers (such was the charge
of malice and infidelity) are as mute in public as they are loquacious and dogmatical in private. Whilst they cautiously avoid the
dangerous encounter of philosophers, they mingle with the rude and illiterate crowd, and insinuate themselves into those minds,
whom their age, their sex, or their education, has the best disposed to receive the impression of superstitious terrors. 184
Footnote 184: Minucius Felix, c. 8, with Wowerus's notes. Celsus ap. Origen, l. iii. p. 138, 142. Julian ap. Cyril. l. vi. p. 206, edit.
This unfavorable picture, though not devoid of a faint resemblance, betrays, by its dark coloring and distorted features, the pencil
of an enemy. As the humble faith of Christ diffused itself through the world, it was embraced by several persons who derived
some consequence from the advantages of nature or fortune. Aristides, who presented an eloquent apology to the emperor
Hadrian, was an Athenian philosopher. 185 Justin Martyr had sought divine knowledge in the schools of Zeno, of Aristotle, of
Pythagoras, and of Plato, before he fortunately was accosted by the old man, or rather the angel, who turned his attention to the
study of the Jewish prophets. 186 Clemens of Alexandria had acquired much various reading in the Greek, and Tertullian in the
Latin, language. Julius Africanus and Origen possessed a very considerable share of the learning of their times; and although the
style of Cyprian is very different from that of Lactantius, we might almost discover that both those writers had been public
teachers of rhetoric. Even the study of philosophy was at length introduced among the Christians, but it was not always productive
of the most salutary effects; knowledge was as often the parent of heresy as of devotion, and the description which was designed
for the followers of Artemon, may, with equal propriety, be applied to the various sects that resisted the successors of the
apostles. "They presume to alter the Holy Scriptures, to abandon the ancient rule of faith, and to form their opinions according to
the subtile precepts of logic. The science of the church is neglected for the study of geometry, and they lose sight of heaven while
they are employed in measuring the earth. Euclid is perpetually in their hands. Aristotle and Theophrastus are the objects of their
admiration; and they express an uncommon reverence for the works of Galen. Their errors are derived from the abuse of the arts
and sciences of the infidels, and they corrupt the simplicity of the gospel by the refinements of human reason." 187
Footnote 185: Euseb. Hist. Eccles. iv. 3. Hieronym. Epist. 83.
Footnote 186: The story is prettily told in Justin's Dialogues. Tillemont, (Mem Ecclesiast. tom. ii. p. 384,) who relates it after him
is sure that the old man was a disguised angel.
Footnote 187: Eusebius, v. 28. It may be hoped, that none, except the heretics, gave occasion to the complaint of Celsus, (ap.
Origen, l. ii. p. 77,) that the Christians were perpetually correcting and altering their Gospels.
Note: Origen states in reply, that he knows of none who had altered the Gospels except the Marcionites, the Valentinians, and
perhaps some followers of Lucanus. - M.
Nor can it be affirmed with truth, that the advantages of birth and fortune were always separated from the profession of
Christianity. Several Roman citizens were brought before the tribunal of Pliny, and he soon discovered, that a great number of
persons of every order of men in Bithynia had deserted the religion of their ancestors. 188 His unsuspected testimony may, in this
instance, obtain more credit than the bold challenge of Tertullian, when he addresses himself to the fears as well as the humanity
of the proconsul of Africa, by assuring him, that if he persists in his cruel intentions, he must decimate Carthage, and that he will
find among the guilty many persons of his own rank, senators and matrons of nobles' extraction, and the friends or relations of his
most intimate friends. 189 It appears, however, that about forty years afterwards the emperor Valerian was persuaded of the
truth of this assertion, since in one of his rescripts he evidently supposes, that senators, Roman knights, and ladies of quality, were
engaged in the Christian sect. 190 The church still continued to increase its outward splendor as it lost its internal purity; and, in
the reign of Diocletian, the palace, the courts of justice, and even the army, concealed a multitude of Christians, who endeavored
to reconcile the interests of the present with those of a future life.
Footnote 188: Plin. Epist. x. 97. Fuerunt alii similis amentiae, cives Romani - - Multi enim omnis aetatis, omnis ordinis, utriusque
sexus, etiam vocuntur in periculum et vocabuntur.
Footnote 189: Tertullian ad Scapulum. Yet even his rhetoric rises no higher than to claim a tenth part of Carthage.
Footnote 190: Cyprian. Epist. 70.
And yet these exceptions are either too few in number, or too recent in time, entirely to remove the imputation of ignorance and
obscurity which has been so arrogantly cast on the first proselytes of Christianity. * Instead of employing in our defense the
fictions of later ages, it will be more prudent to convert the occasion of scandal into a subject of edification. Our serious thoughts
will suggest to us, that the apostles themselves were chosen by Providence among the fishermen of Galilee, and that the lower we
depress the temporal condition of the first Christians, the more reason we shall find to admire their merit and success. It is
incumbent on us diligently to remember, that the kingdom of heaven was promised to the poor in spirit, and that minds afflicted by
calamity and the contempt of mankind, cheerfully listen to the divine promise of future happiness; while, on the contrary, the
fortunate are satisfied with the possession of this world; and the wise abuse in doubt and dispute their vain superiority of reason
Footnote *: This incomplete enumeration ought to be increased by the names of several Pagans converted at the dawn of
Christianity, and whose conversion weakens the reproach which the historian appears to support. Such are, the Proconsul Sergius
Paulus, converted at Paphos, (Acts xiii. 7 - 12.) Dionysius, member of the Areopagus, converted with several others, al Athens,
(Acts xvii. 34;) several persons at the court of Nero, (Philip. iv 22;) Erastus, receiver at Corinth, (Rom. xvi.23;) some Asiarchs,
(Acts xix. 31) As to the philosophers, we may add Tatian, Athenagoras, Theophilus of Antioch, Hegesippus, Melito, Miltiades,
Pantaenus, Ammenius, all distinguished for their genius and learning. - G.
We stand in need of such reflections to comfort us for the loss of some illustrious characters, which in our eyes might have
seemed the most worthy of the heavenly present. The names of Seneca, of the elder and the younger Pliny, of Tacitus, of
Plutarch, of Galen, of the slave Epictetus, and of the emperor Marcus Antoninus, adorn the age in which they flourished, and exalt
the dignity of human nature. They filled with glory their respective stations, either in active or contemplative life; their excellent
understandings were improved by study; Philosophy had purified their minds from the prejudices of the popular superstition; and
their days were spent in the pursuit of truth and the practice of virtue. Yet all these sages (it is no less an object of surprise than of
concern) overlooked or rejected the perfection of the Christian system. Their language or their silence equally discover their
contempt for the growing sect, which in their time had diffused itself over the Roman empire. Those among them who
condescended to mention the Christians, consider them only as obstinate and perverse enthusiasts, who exacted an implicit
submission to their mysterious doctrines, without being able to produce a single argument that could engage the attention of men of
sense and learning. 191
Footnote 191: Dr. Lardner, in his first and second volumes of Jewish and Christian testimonies, collects and illustrates those of Pliny the younger, of Tacitus, of Galen, of Marcus Antoninus, and perhaps of Epictetus, (for it is doubtful whether that philosopher
means to speak of the Christians.) The new sect is totally unnoticed by Seneca, the elder Pliny, and Plutarch.
It is at least
doubtful whether any of these philosophers perused the apologies * which the primitive Christians repeatedly published in behalf
of themselves and of their religion; but it is much to be lamented that such a cause was not defended by abler advocates. They
expose with superfluous eloquence the extravagance of Polytheism. They interest our compassion by displaying the
innocence and sufferings of their injured brethren. But when they would demonstrate the divine origin of Christianity, they insist
much more strongly on the predictions which announced, than on the miracles which accompanied, the appearance of the
Messiah. Their favorite argument might serve to edify a Christian or to convert a Jew, since both the one and the other
acknowledge the authority of those prophecies, and both are obliged, with devout reverence, to search for their sense and their
accomplishment. But this mode of persuasion loses much of its weight and influence, when it is addressed to those who neither
understand nor respect the Mosaic dispensation and the prophetic style. 192 In the unskilful hands of Justin and of the succeeding
apologists, the sublime meaning of the Hebrew oracles evaporates in distant types, affected conceits, and cold allegories; and even
their authenticity was rendered suspicious to an unenlightened Gentile, by the mixture of pious forgeries, which, under the names
of Orpheus, Hermes, and the Sibyls, 193 were obtruded on him as of equal value with the genuine inspirations of Heaven. The
adoption of fraud and sophistry in the defense of revelation too often reminds us of the injudicious conduct of those poets who load
their invulnerable heroes with a useless weight of cumbersome and brittle armor.
Footnote *: The emperors Hadrian, Antoninus &c., read with astonishment the apologies of Justin Martyr, of Aristides, of Melito,
&c. (See St. Hieron. ad mag. orat. Orosius, lviii. c. 13.) Eusebius says expressly, that the cause of Christianity was defended
before the senate, in a very elegant discourse, by Apollonius the Martyr.
Footnote 192: If the famous prophecy of the Seventy Weeks had been alleged to a Roman philosopher, would he
not have replied in the words of Cicero, "Quae tandem ista auguratio est, annorum potius quam aut raensium aut dierum?" De
Divinatione, ii. 30. Observe with what irreverence Lucian, (in Alexandro, c. 13.) and his friend Celsus ap. Origen, (l. vii. p. 327,)
express themselves concerning the Hebrew prophets.
Footnote 193: The philosophers who derided the more ancient predictions of the Sibyls, would easily have detected the Jewish and
Christian forgeries, which have been so triumphantly quoted by the fathers, from Justin Martyr to Lactantius. When the Sibylline
verses had performed their appointed task, they, like the system of the millennium, were quietly laid aside. The Christian Sybil had
unluckily fixed the ruin of Rome for the year 195, A. U. C. 948.
But how shall we excuse the supine inattention of the Pagan and philosophic world, to those evidences which were represented by
the hand of Omnipotence, not to their reason, but to their senses? During the age of Christ, of his apostles, and of their first
disciples, the doctrine which they preached was confirmed by innumerable prodigies. The lame walked, the blind saw, the sick
were healed, the dead were raised, daemons were expelled, and the laws of Nature were frequently suspended for the benefit of
the church. But the sages of Greece and Rome turned aside from the awful spectacle, and, pursuing the ordinary occupations of
life and study, appeared unconscious of any alterations in the moral or physical government of the world. Under the reign of
Tiberius, the whole earth, 194 or at least a celebrated province of the Roman empire, 195 was involved in a preternatural
darkness of three hours. Even this miraculous event, which ought to have excited the wonder, the curiosity, and the devotion of
mankind, passed without notice in an age of science and history. 196 It happened during the lifetime of Seneca and the elder
Pliny, who must have experienced the immediate effects, or received the earliest intelligence, of the prodigy. Each of these
philosophers, in a laborious work, has recorded all the great phenomena of Nature, earthquakes, meteors comets, and eclipses,
which his indefatigable curiosity could collect. 197 Both the one and the other have omitted to mention the greatest phenomenon
to which the mortal eye has been witness since the creation of the globe. A distinct chapter of Pliny 198 is designed for eclipses
of an extraordinary nature and unusual duration; but he contents himself with describing the singular defect of light which followed
the murder of Caesar, when, during the greatest part of a year, the orb of the sun appeared pale and without splendor. The season
of obscurity, which cannot surely be compared with the preternatural darkness of the Passion, had been already celebrated by
most of the poets 199 and historians of that memorable age. 200
Footnote 194: The fathers, as they are drawn out in battle array by Dom Calmet, (Dissertations sur la Bible, tom. iii. p. 295 - 308,)
seem to cover the whole earth with darkness, in which they are followed by most of the moderns.
Footnote 195: Origen ad Matth. c. 27, and a few modern critics, Beza, Le Clerc, Lardner, &c., are desirous of confining it to the
land of Judea.
Footnote 196: The celebrated passage of Phlegon is now wisely abandoned. When Tertullian assures the Pagans
that the mention of the prodigy is found in Arcanis (not Archivis) vestris, (see his Apology, c. 21,) he probably appeals to the
Sibylline verses, which relate it exactly in the words of the Gospel.
Footnote 197: Seneca, Quaest. Natur. l. i. 15, vi. l. vii. 17. Plin. Hist. Natur. l. ii.
Footnote 198: Plin. Hist. Natur. ii. 30.
Footnote 199: Virgil. Georgic. i. 466. Tibullus, l. i. Eleg. v. ver. 75. Ovid Metamorph. xv. 782. Lucan. Pharsal. i. 540. The last of
these poets places this prodigy before the civil war.
Footnote 200: See a public epistle of M. Antony in Joseph. Antiquit. xiv. 12. Plutarch in Caesar. p. 471. Appian. Bell. Civil. l. iv.
Dion Cassius, l. xlv. p. 431. Julius Obsequens, c. 128. His little treatise is an abstract of Livy's prodigies.
End of Chapter.
Back to Chapter Listing