A
logical fallacy in
induction where the
conclusion is
denied despite
strong inductive evidence. Although they
might be right, they are
probably not and more
proof is necessary to show that they are.
Example: The last 12 times you tried that, you blew up the lab. You haven't changed anything. Yet, you insist it will work.
Kind of hard to prove it, since they're already ignoring the obvious. A clue-by-four may be required.