Dungeons and Dragons

See also: Dungeons & Dragons

created by che

(thing) by amelinda (4 y) (print) ? 2 C!s Wed Apr 19 2000 at 0:08:29

Dungeons & Dragons was the original version of E. Gary Gygax's role-playing game. Based on fantasy novels, it allowed the player to define their character along several attributes, and pick a race, profession, and alignment. D&D is a pretty basic and simplified version of the rules; it is intended to introduce the player to the game (and then they can get into AD&D).

To play the game, you need: someone willing to be the Dungeon Master, who runs the game; some other people who want to play; paper; pencils; dice; and a rulebook (I own a booklet with the D&D rules from 1979.). Little miniature figures are nice, but not necessary.

cardinal has a friend with an original, mimeographed copy of the rules, with a cover letter from "Gary" asking him to play test his new game.

Information taken from "Dungeons & Dragons," 1979, published by TSR Hobbies, Inc..

(idea) by WWWWolf (1.2 y) (print) ? Sat Sep 02 2000 at 19:57:13

It might also be worth noting that since "classic" D&D isn't being sold anymore, Wizards of the Coast decided to rename the 3rd edition of AD&D back to "Dungeons & Dragons".

Agreed, if you want to give introduction to roleplaying, D&D (the classic, not AD&D - or who knows, maybe AD&D too) might be cool. After you've done, ditch it and move on to GURPS or something other - or learn to DM well enough or the playing will degenerate to "XP and gold!"... and lo, new generation of Diablo cheaters and munchkins are born. =)

(Yeah, D&D was the first RPG I played and DMed - then I moved directly to GURPS. =)

(thing) by Oneiromancer (1.4 mon) (print) ? 1 C! Sat May 12 2001 at 8:27:19

The strange thing about D&D is that the rules are pretty bad, but the game is good. Why? The designers simply put so much detail into the universe that a Dungeon Master doesn't need to wing it, while simultaneously leaving the DM a great deal of freedom. Other systems which have had comparable levels of detail (Rifts, for example) are so much more complicated in their detail since the worlds are enumerated: there is only one Mexico overridden with Vampires. In D&D, the DM has the freedom to make the kobold wizards powerful even though kobolds 'should' hardly ever be able to cast magic at all, and never well; the DM can ally the Drow with the Gryphons. In Rifts, a knowledgeable player could simply say, "No, they aren't". In D&D, you can say, "They are, here!" while still having a great depth of material to draw upon.

(thing) by futurehog (5.6 y) (print) ? 1 C! Thu Jul 12 2001 at 0:47:30

This is an RPG marketed by TSR and developed by E. Gary Gygax. While there are many universes designed to fit with this set of rules, the technology is usually vaguely medieval, and the game generally focuses on wizards using spells and warriors using sharp objects to kill monsters and take gold and magical items, and also gain experience which enables them to become more powerful. Along the way they tend to do the sort of heroic things you see in fantasy novels.

The first edition of the game, or basic set had a number of problems. A dagger could attack twice per round, doing between one and four hitpoints of damage, while a sword could only attack once per round, doing between one to six hitpoints of damage. A dagger was a better weapon than a sword, especially if you had a good strength bonus!

There are now a number of books of rules, and a number of gaming universes in which these rules can be used, and a number of D&D modules for each universe. In general, creating a D&D character requires somewhat less thought about character conception than some other games such as GURPS, and is somewhat faster, although there is a fair amount of die rolling and paperwork involved. Despite the D&D skills system the characters are somewhat less indivdual than in some other role playing games, but can still be a lot of fun. D&D tends to be many people's introduction to role playing.

(thing) by anyend (7.9 mon) (print) ? 5 C!s Fri Nov 12 2004 at 15:55:12

Printing History

The first true D&D rule set is often referred to as either "original D&D" (OD&D) or "White Box D&D". The latter appellation comes from its packaging. It was packaged in a white box. However, the famous white box came later. The first three printings (January 1974, January 1975, and April 1975) were packaged in a faux wood grain box¹. The first three printings had a white label affixed to the front featuring the image of a mounted warrior. This mounted warrior image was reused on the internal Men & Magic booklet. Each box and internal booklets credited Gary Gygax and Dave Arneson as the authors.

Print runs for the first three editions were as such:

First 1,000 copies
Second 2,000 copies
Third 3,300 copies

Each box was hand assembled by Gygax and his friends. With a cover price of $10, this little garage operation grossed over $60K in a bit more than a year. If you consider a decent wage was about $11,000 a year in the early to mid '70s, this little home operation grossed nearly $250K in today's dollars. Not a bad bit of work.²

The fourth printing (November 1975) introduced what many now call the "White Box" edition, as it featured a pure white box. The mounted warrior image on the box cover was replaced with the now familiar, iconic, albeit much crappier image of a wizard casting a spell at some orcs. The fourth printing, which was ramped up to 25,000 copies, marks the moment when D&D went from obscure localized hobby to a growing national phenomenon.³

The sixth printing (1977) marks the moment when even lawyers started to hear about D&D. Up until the sixth printing, the D&D booklets and supplements made references to hobbits, ents, balrogs, nazguls, and even Tolkien himself.⁴ Naturally the Tolkien estate came calling and forced the changes. Hobbits became Halflings and ents became treants. Balrogs became Type VI demons . Years later Christian fundamentalists, who only bought D&D to burn it, forced the morally bankrupt T$R incarnation to remove demons altogether, replacing them with some totally gay moniker like "Rhzermoraz".⁵

The sixth printing was released in conjunction with the more user friendly D&D Basic Set (sometimes referred to as the "blue book" edition because the 8"x11" rule book had a blue cover). To distinguish between white box D&D and blue book D&D, the white box now featured a little starburst on the cover that said "Original Collector's Edition".⁶

The Books Themselves

At this juncture one might get the sense that D&D was all about purchasing a box.⁷ What was inside the box was what really made D&D. Inside were three booklets titled Volume 1: Men & Magic, Volume 2: Monsters and Treasure, Volume 3: The Underworld and Wilderness Adventures.

Men & Magic

The first volume dealt with the generation of abilities, character classes, spells, combat and experience/level advancement. In OD&D, higher abilities did not confer many bonuses, like extra damage or better savings throws. Higher abilities did, however, help characters accumulate experience points faster if their prime requisite ability was high for their character class. For example a magic user with an intelligence of 15 or more received a 10% bonus on accumulated experience.

Men & Magic offered only three character classes. One could be a Fighting Man, a Magic User, or a Cleric. (The thief and paladin classes were added in the Greyhawk supplement and the Monk and Assasin character classes were added in the Blackmoor supplement.

A numbered character level system wasn't actually used. Characters advanced via their titles. What we would think of as a Level 3 fighter was simply known as a "Swordsman". A Swordsman eventually advanced to the Hero level. Herein lies AD&D's odd inclusion of level titles which seemed pointless, inconsistent (e.g., a cleric progressing from "bishop" to "lama" made little historical sense) and highly afterthoughtish. In OD&D combat was based on your title. OD&D used the Chainmail miniature combat rules. X miniature was a "Hero" which was more powerful than Y miniature which was a "Swordsman". (Again this all seems odd until you phrase it like "This miniature is a Tiger tank which is more powerful than this miniature which is a Sherman tank...")

OD&D generally assumed one came to it via Chainmail and used the Chainmail combat system. It didn't actually republish the Chainmail combat system. For those without the Chainmail rules, Men & Magic did include an alternative combat matrix similar to AD&D's where titles could be converted to an attack level.

Armor class ranged from 9 (no armor) to 2 (plate mail and shield). There was no provision for lower armor classes, like 1 (plate mail and a +1 shield). Damage was purely 1d6. No distinction was made if one was using a two-handed sword or a dagger. All weapons did a single D6 of damage.

Magic spells went up to level 6 and there were only 70 magic user spells defined. Clerics had only 5 levels of spells.

Alignments were present although limited to the Law/Netural/Chaos axis.

Monsters & Treasure

Monsters & Treasure featured a line drawing of a dragon on its cover. As the name implies, the booklet covered what monsters and treasure adventurers might encounter. The booklet listed roughly 50 monsters. Most were out of either Tolkien (orcs and ents) or standard monsters from mythology (dragons, hydras, trolls, etc.) The only novel monsters were the purple worm and the creeping Lysol nightmare variants: green slime, yellow mold, grey ooze, black pudding, et al.

There was the standard treasure type/treasure in lair table. Magic swords and armor were introduced as well rules on how to use them in combat. A +1 shield did not lower your actual armor class (from, say, 2 to 1). The +1 was to be subtracted from the attacker's roll.

The Underworld and Wilderness Adventures

The third and final booklet in the OD&D set covered some of the finer points of creating and mapping a dungeon, populating it with monsters and treasure, and filling it in with traps and tricks.

The booklet also covered the all important aspect of time and movement, within a dungeon and when in the wilderness. In a dungeon the tradition 1"=10' square miniature system was used. When the adventure busted out into the open sky, a hex system was suggested.

The wilderness adventure section dealt mainly with random wilderness encounters and what sorts of castles one would find out or could construct in the world and how many fighting men and magic users would be living there. This all seems like a hold over from the Chainmail days. Many things that found their way into AD&D which seem to have a prominent place within the game system but are almost never used (like the aforementioned level titles or the number of men at arms a Fighter can command) owes a lot to the Chainmail days. Role playing in its infancy seemed to be concerned with your characters growing in wealth and power so they could afford castles and armies and then wage war game style combat.

The last part of The Underworld and Wilderness Adventures dealt with conducting larger scale combat in the air and on sea. This all pretty much made its way into the AD&D Dungeon Masters Guide. Again, it seems another item that not many gamers ever employed but was important and of interest to the Chainmail generation.

_____________

¹ Comparing OD&D's packaging to TVs, station wagons, and home video game systems like the Atari 2600 of the day, one can rightly conclude you simply could not release a product in the 1970s without the addition of wood grain. What the fascination was with faux wood grain remains a mystery to this author. My connection to the '70s, my older brother, has been unable to shed any light on this phenomenon.

² My inflation calculation would mean the D&D box cost $41 in today's dollars.

³ Most of D&D's early players were ex-military, notably ex-navy. The military connection no doubt helped vector and spread the game, transmitting the game from ex-military to current military and then to all the locales from which the services drew these recruits. I believe at one point every submarine in the navy had a D&D group.

⁴ Despite Tolkien references replete within the game system, Gygax seems to swear up and down that D&D was not at all based on The Lord of the Rings. In an attempt to distance himself from the book, an attempt that really no one finds convincing, Gygax claims he found Tolkien's works boring. In His words "I'm not a big Tolkien fan, though. I did love the movies, but I yawned through the books. I found them very droll and very dull. I still don't give hoot about Hobbits.".

⁵Really, I hope all the people who worked at T$R during that era burn in hell. Buncha fuckin' pussies. And when did "gay" become defined as meaning ONLY "homosexual"? Last time I checked it also meant that something was without serious meaning.

⁶ An appellation that, based on auction history, fails to prove itself out. Lawyers today would no doubt have included a disclaimer, someplace, that notes "original collector's edition" is a forward looking statement and in should no way be construed as a guarantee of the edition's future value. While a mint OD&D first edition can fetch $2000, a mint "Collector's Edition" might only fetch $100. If you invested in the Dow Jones Index in 1975, your $10 investment would be worth $125 today. Operating under the assumption that what makes something collectable is that it increases in value, your Collector's Edition would not have kept pace with one of the most brain dead forms of investing.

⁷ Getting an empty box to market has massive costs. Usually one needs to put something it the box to get sufficient numbers of people to purchase the box to make a profit. It's been suggested that there are a handful of companies out there that have such a loyal, salivating, mindless zombie like army of followers that they could make a go of it. To wit, "Microsoft Box" would probably make a profit. TSR was at that stage once too.

See also for the original D&D supplements:

I - Greyhhawk, II - Blackmoor, III - Eldritch Wizardry, IV - Gods, Demi-Gods & Heroes, V - Swords & Spells

printable version
chaos

Dungeons & Dragons	Advanced Dungeons and Dragons	D&D Parodies of 80's Songs	GURPS
E. Gary Gygax	Dungeons and Dragons Third Edition	D&D	Palace of the Silver Princess
You know you're a geek when...	AD&D	Gelatinous cube	The orc that wouldn't die
Dungeon Master	D&D classes	Chaotic Neutral	Chicks in Chain Mail
"Gay" being used as an adjective for something bad	RPG	Warning Signs of Occult Involvement	RuneQuest
Record of Lodoss War	Shadowrun	magic sucks	TSR

No more writeups are being accepted for this node. What are we, a bunch of nerds? If you feel you have something to add to this node, post it on your Scratch Pad and contact an editor.

Login
Password

remember me
password reminder
register

Everything2 Help

The best nodes of all time:
Never coin a phrase if you can help it
December 20, 2002
Shetland Sheepdog
Was the Allied Bombing in WW2 a success?
The Book of Job
house
The truth about SUVs
Spontaneous human combustion
orbital railgun
The Endangered Species Act
Eminent Domain disaster: Sunset Hills (St. Louis), Missouri
Grethesis
Jack Kevorkian

locke baron
Udaloy class destroyer	(thing)
Scaevola
Same-sex marriage	(idea)
SteveMurrayFromNZ
Waiver	(idea)
nailbiter
nerve stapling	(thing)
locke baron
Multiple Myeloma	(thing)
SubSane
blonde, freckles, skinny, short	(person)
arcanamundi
A Ruba'iyat for May	(person)
riverrun
Timed Writing	(idea)
auraseer
Fling	(fiction)
StrawberryFrog
Iron Man	(review)
devolution
Misogyny and Porn, East to West - An Empirical Analysis	(idea)
devolution
Korea is a place that refuses to stand still	(idea)
Beanie127
The Pacifist Soldier	(fiction)
VergilKint
Distilled from Dreams	(fiction)
Scaevola
Roman marriage	(thing)

Everything 2 is brought to you by the letter C and The Everything Development Company