A logical fallacy in which the construction of a sentence allows multiple interpretations. If you ever ask an oracle for advice, watch out for this.

Example, using parens to clarify grouping:   Sentence: "I talked about sex with your grandmother."
  Meaning 1: "I talked (about sex) (with your grandmother)."
  Meaning 2: "I talked about (sex with your grandmother)."

To show the Amphiboly, identify the offending phrase and give the two possible interpretations.

This term was introduced by Aristotle in his Sophistic Refutations and inherited by medieval rhetoricians to indicate an ambiguous proposition in which no single term is equivocal (i.e., in which no single term can be interpreted as ambiguous).

For example, take the phrase "The killing of tyrants is justified". It can be interpreted to mean that tyrants' killing is justified, or that it is justifiable to kill tyrants. The proposition (i.e., phrase) is ambiguous, though each individual term (killing, tyrants, justification) remain clear and unambiguous.

Gritchka adds two classic examples from linguistics: "flying planes can be dangerous" and "the shooting of the hunters".

Am*phib"o*ly (#), n.; pl. Amphibolies (#). [L. amphibolia, Gr. : cf. OE. amphibolie. See Amphibolous.]

Ambiguous discourse; amphibology.

If it oracle contrary to our interest or humor, we will create an amphiboly, a double meaning where there is none. Whitlock.


© Webster 1913.

Log in or registerto write something here or to contact authors.