<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:base="http://everything2.com/">
    <title>montecarlo's New Writeups</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://everything2.com/index.pl?node=Everything%20User%20Search&amp;usersearch=montecarlo" />
    <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="?node=New%20Writeups%20Atom%20Feed&amp;type=ticker&amp;foruser=montecarlo" />
    <id>http://everything2.com/?node=New%20Writeups%20Atom%20Feed&amp;foruser=montecarlo</id>
    <updated>2012-09-17T22:04:56Z</updated>
<entry><title>September 18, 2012 (log)</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://everything2.com/user/montecarlo/writeups/September+18%252C+2012"/><id>http://everything2.com/user/montecarlo/writeups/September+18%252C+2012</id><author><name>montecarlo</name><uri>http://everything2.com/user/montecarlo</uri></author><published>2012-09-17T22:04:56Z</published><updated>2012-09-17T22:04:56Z</updated>
<content type="html">&lt;p&gt;Rotten? Yes. we all have some rotten-(n)ess in us. Mine isÂ  confined (but not exclusively) to E2 reading: I frequently (though not always) skip the fiction pieces. That's certainly rotten. But, on the other hand,Â it's not evil. Because I'm not disrespectful, disinterested orÂ even dismissive of fiction, far from it. ButÂ reading &lt;a href=&quot;/title/tl%253Bdr&quot;&gt;tl;dr&lt;/a&gt; pieces on the LED/LCD screen is quite uncomfortable. If I had an ipad or a &lt;a href=&quot;/title/Kindle&quot;&gt;Kindle&lt;/a&gt;, that may be different, but I don't.Â  Anyway, I think that this problem is of some importance. Or maybe not.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Because, as I see it, E2 futures beckon brightly to fiction. E2 isÂ the place where you can try out your compositional experiments and GET A &lt;a href=&quot;/title/FEEDBACK&quot;&gt;FEEDBACK&lt;/a&gt;. The feedback part of E2 has not been given quite the due it deserves - it's actually the single most particular characteristic of the site. So on E2 you can feedbackwise hone your fictional skills (and test various approaches) until you sell 44 million paper copies of the stuff. This should attract a whole lot of aspiring&amp;hellip;</content>
</entry><entry><title>Hairriot (thing)</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://everything2.com/user/montecarlo/writeups/Hairriot"/><id>http://everything2.com/user/montecarlo/writeups/Hairriot</id><author><name>montecarlo</name><uri>http://everything2.com/user/montecarlo</uri></author><published>2012-03-20T14:45:25Z</published><updated>2012-03-20T14:45:25Z</updated>
<content type="html">

&lt;p&gt;Â &lt;/p&gt;


&lt;p&gt;Hairriot? A &lt;a href=&quot;/title/dyslectic&quot;&gt;dyslectic&lt;/a&gt; spelling of Harriet? Not really.
Rather, itâs a contraction of âhair riotâ. So it has a lot to do with hair, but
mostly in Sweden and not with all kinds of hair.&lt;/p&gt;




&lt;p&gt;It all started on March 10, at the 2012 Swedish &lt;a href=&quot;/title/Eurovision+Song+Festival&quot;&gt;Eurovision
Song Festival&lt;/a&gt; finals, which were won by a generously-haired singer, Loreen.
Aside from having a nice voice, Loreen also has a highly elastic figure, which
she displays in a wild dance, while softly singing. But her most visible asset
is a thick mane of straight but voluminous, fluffy &lt;a href=&quot;/title/hair&quot;&gt;hair&lt;/a&gt;. Her hair is visible to
such a degree that her facial features are mainly left in the dark. For the
most part only a pretty nose protrudes from the tangle of dark tresses.Â &amp;hellip;</content>
</entry><entry><title>Pandeism from First Principles (thing)</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://everything2.com/user/montecarlo/writeups/Pandeism+from+First+Principles"/><id>http://everything2.com/user/montecarlo/writeups/Pandeism+from+First+Principles</id><author><name>montecarlo</name><uri>http://everything2.com/user/montecarlo</uri></author><published>2011-10-22T22:23:21Z</published><updated>2011-10-22T22:23:21Z</updated>
<content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;I certainly do like&lt;/strong&gt; the principles in the above essay, or to be more precise, its well-put statements of fact (as we know them today). But I do differ, sometimes rather strongly, about some of the conclusions. Nevertheless, Iâm most sympathetic to the authorâs truly benevolent aims.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The problem, to my mind, is that many of the syllogisms in this essay are somewhat &lt;a href=&quot;/title/anthropocentric&quot;&gt;anthropocentric&lt;/a&gt;. The main point - which our learned friend puts forward in his essay â seems to be a &lt;a href=&quot;/title/Spinoza&quot;&gt;Spinoza&lt;/a&gt;-like idea of the world: the Universe and God are identical, God and the world are just different names for the same thing. This is a rather reasonable statement, semantically speaking. But why does it need to be bolstered by trying to conjure up a Creator? Thatâs an &lt;a href=&quot;/title/enigma&quot;&gt;enigma&lt;/a&gt;, to me at least. But then, Iâm a European, so I donât know these things in depth.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Anyway, the &lt;a href=&quot;/title/argument&quot;&gt;argument&lt;/a&gt; concerning the existence of a Creator seems, in the above essay, to hang on the fact that, without any reasonable&amp;hellip;</content>
</entry><entry><title>Waffles Day (event)</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://everything2.com/user/montecarlo/writeups/Waffles+Day"/><id>http://everything2.com/user/montecarlo/writeups/Waffles+Day</id><author><name>montecarlo</name><uri>http://everything2.com/user/montecarlo</uri></author><published>2011-03-25T18:04:36Z</published><updated>2011-03-25T18:04:36Z</updated>
<content type="html">&lt;p&gt;The closest Sunday to &lt;a href=&quot;/title/March&quot;&gt;March&lt;/a&gt; 25 is Our Lady Annunciation Day. It happens to occur approximately nine months before Christmas (birthdate of Jesus), making it a virtuous theological date for pinning down the time of the conception of Jesus (supposedly by the &lt;a href=&quot;/title/Holy+Spirit&quot;&gt;Holy Spirit&lt;/a&gt;), in the &lt;a href=&quot;/title/womb&quot;&gt;womb&lt;/a&gt; of Our Lady Maria.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;May this be as it may â I mean the spooky &lt;a href=&quot;/title/conception&quot;&gt;conception&lt;/a&gt; business â but what is particularly interesting in Sweden about the period around Our Lady Annunciation Day is that&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;center&quot;&gt;everybody eats &lt;a href=&quot;/title/waffles&quot;&gt;waffles&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Eating waffles in itself is hardly surprising â in most countries waffles are eaten in springtime, due to increased egg-production around that time of the year. But what is a bit curious is that the day in question is mainly called âWaffles Dayâ in &lt;a href=&quot;/title/Sweden&quot;&gt;Sweden&lt;/a&gt;, not often âOur Lady Dayâ. Such a theologically un-orthodox name for an important date in the Christian &lt;a href=&quot;/title/Ecclesiastic&quot;&gt;Ecclesiastic&lt;/a&gt; Calendar demands an explanation, and here it is:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;âOur Lady Dayâ in Swedish&amp;hellip;</content>
</entry><entry><title>Tau (idea)</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://everything2.com/user/montecarlo/writeups/Tau"/><id>http://everything2.com/user/montecarlo/writeups/Tau</id><author><name>montecarlo</name><uri>http://everything2.com/user/montecarlo</uri></author><published>2011-01-17T00:05:19Z</published><updated>2011-01-17T00:05:19Z</updated>
<content type="html">&lt;p&gt;The circumference of a circle is 2&amp;#960; times its radius. This is a bit confusing, having to stare at a factor TWO in an expression that is supposed to produce the &lt;a href=&quot;/title/circumference&quot;&gt;circumference&lt;/a&gt; of ONE whole circle. Also, if you rotate the circle radius ONE full turn (360 degrees), your &lt;a href=&quot;/title/radian&quot;&gt;radian&lt;/a&gt; expression will contain an irrelevant factor TWO. Inelegant, clumsy, unnerving.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But these (and plenty more) annoyances can be resolved, if you care to define a different circle constant, &amp;#964; (Greek letter tau): &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;center&quot;&gt;&amp;#964;= circumference/radius &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;center&quot;&gt;Now, using this new circle constant &amp;#964; , one full rotation (360 degrees) of a unit radius becomes simply 1 x &amp;#964; = &amp;#964;&amp;hellip;</content>
</entry><entry><title>A tale of two wars (essay)</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://everything2.com/user/montecarlo/writeups/A+tale+of+two+wars"/><id>http://everything2.com/user/montecarlo/writeups/A+tale+of+two+wars</id><author><name>montecarlo</name><uri>http://everything2.com/user/montecarlo</uri></author><published>2010-04-12T20:22:43Z</published><updated>2010-04-12T20:22:43Z</updated>
<content type="html">&lt;h3&gt;&lt;b&gt;Two celebrations, two wars&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/h3&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
On May 9th Russia celebrates the victorious end of &lt;a href=&quot;/title/the+Great+Patriotic+War&quot;&gt;the Great Patriotic War&lt;/a&gt; (GPW). In the West these impressive Moscow festivities are seen as the Russian version of celebrating the end of &lt;a href=&quot;/title/the+Second+World+War&quot;&gt;the Second World War&lt;/a&gt; (WWII). But Western nations commemorate the end of WWII in Europe on May 8th. Are they celebrating the same event? Perhaps not. These two springtime celebrations differ by much more than just one day. They actually concern two different wars. On closer inspection the Great Patriotic War (GPW) is poles apart from the Second World War (WWII).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h3&gt;
The Second World War (WWII), act I&lt;/h3&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The Second World War started with the attack on &lt;a href=&quot;/title/Poland&quot;&gt;Poland&lt;/a&gt; in September 1939, by &lt;b&gt;two&lt;/b&gt; totalitarian allies, Nazi Germany and Soviet Russia. The Nazis attacked from the West. Shortly after, the Soviets invaded from the east, exactly as Hitler and Stalin had previously agreed (&lt;a href=&quot;/title/Molotov-Ribbentrop+Pact&quot;&gt;Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact&lt;/a&gt;).&lt;/p&gt;


&amp;hellip;</content>
</entry></feed>
