<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:base="http://everything2.com/">
    <title>Teo-lohi's New Writeups</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://everything2.com/index.pl?node=Everything%20User%20Search&amp;usersearch=Teo-lohi" />
    <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="?node=New%20Writeups%20Atom%20Feed&amp;type=ticker&amp;foruser=Teo-lohi" />
    <id>http://everything2.com/?node=New%20Writeups%20Atom%20Feed&amp;foruser=Teo-lohi</id>
    <updated>2006-04-23T17:52:23Z</updated>
<entry><title>John Rawls's Two Principles of Justice (idea)</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://everything2.com:80/user/Teo-lohi/writeups/John+Rawls%2527s+Two+Principles+of+Justice"/><id>http://everything2.com:80/user/Teo-lohi/writeups/John+Rawls%2527s+Two+Principles+of+Justice</id><author><name>Teo-lohi</name><uri>http://everything2.com:80/user/Teo-lohi</uri></author><published>2006-04-23T17:52:23Z</published><updated>2006-04-23T17:52:23Z</updated>
<content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/title/John+Rawls&quot;&gt;John Rawls's&lt;/a&gt; &lt;i&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/title/A+Theory+of+Justice&quot;&gt;A Theory of Justice&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/i&gt; is &lt;i&gt;the&lt;/i&gt; classic of modern &lt;a href=&quot;/title/political+philosophy&quot;&gt;political philosophy&lt;/a&gt;. In this work, Rawls puts forward his theory of &lt;a href=&quot;/title/justice+as+fairness&quot;&gt;justice as fairness&lt;/a&gt;. He argues that the basic institutions of society must be regulated by two principles of justice: the &lt;a href=&quot;/title/liberty+principle&quot;&gt;liberty principle&lt;/a&gt; and the &lt;a href=&quot;/title/difference+principle&quot;&gt;difference principle&lt;/a&gt;. In this writeup I discuss both Rawls's formulation of the principles and his arguments for them. I will first give some preliminary remarks about the scope of &lt;a href=&quot;/title/justice&quot;&gt;justice&lt;/a&gt; and Rawls's general conception of justice. Then, I briefly outline the two principles of justice. After this, Rawls's methodology for reaching the two principles is discussed, and only then can I present Rawls's actual argument for the principles.&lt;/p&gt; 

&lt;p&gt;My aim here is mainly expository. I am personally very sympathetic to Rawls, and I believe &lt;i&gt;A Theory of Justice&lt;/i&gt; presents a vision of society worth striving for. In this writeup I am not going to try to persuade you, however. I will simply attempt to&amp;hellip;</content>
</entry><entry><title>Alasdair MacIntyre's Reconstructive Project: Practice, Narrative and Tradition (idea)</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://everything2.com:80/user/Teo-lohi/writeups/Alasdair+MacIntyre%2527s+Reconstructive+Project%253A+Practice%252C+Narrative+and+Tradition"/><id>http://everything2.com:80/user/Teo-lohi/writeups/Alasdair+MacIntyre%2527s+Reconstructive+Project%253A+Practice%252C+Narrative+and+Tradition</id><author><name>Teo-lohi</name><uri>http://everything2.com:80/user/Teo-lohi</uri></author><published>2006-04-17T20:08:55Z</published><updated>2006-04-17T20:08:55Z</updated>
<content type="html">&lt;p&gt;In two previous writeups I have discussed &lt;a href=&quot;/title/Alasdair+MacIntyre&quot;&gt;Alasdair MacIntyre's&lt;/a&gt; diagnosis of the &lt;a href=&quot;/title/Alasdair+MacIntyre%2527s+Disquieting+Suggestion&quot;&gt;state of modern liberal culture&lt;/a&gt;, and his &lt;a href=&quot;/title/The+Enlightenment+Project&quot;&gt;historical argument&lt;/a&gt; as to why this has come about. In this writeup I consider MacIntyre's solution to the malaise of modernity. MacIntyre seeks to reconstruct a conception of the &lt;a href=&quot;/title/virtue+ethics&quot;&gt;virtues&lt;/a&gt; which is loyal to the classical &lt;a href=&quot;/title/Aristotle&quot;&gt;Aristotelian tradition&lt;/a&gt;, but not dependent on Aristotle's &lt;a href=&quot;/title/metaphysical+biology&quot;&gt;metaphysical biology&lt;/a&gt;. MacIntyre's project has three stages, and I will look at each one in turn. Finally, I give some tentative criticisms of MacIntyre's approach.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;The concept of a practice&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
MacIntyre's reconstructive project begins with what he calls 'practices'. His definition is as follows:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;By a 'practice' I am going to mean any coherent and complex form of socially established cooperative human activity through which goods internal to that form of&lt;/blockquote&gt;&amp;hellip;</content>
</entry><entry><title>The Enlightenment Project (idea)</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://everything2.com:80/user/Teo-lohi/writeups/The+Enlightenment+Project"/><id>http://everything2.com:80/user/Teo-lohi/writeups/The+Enlightenment+Project</id><author><name>Teo-lohi</name><uri>http://everything2.com:80/user/Teo-lohi</uri></author><published>2006-04-16T16:05:42Z</published><updated>2006-04-16T16:05:42Z</updated>
<content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/title/Alasdair+MacIntyre&quot;&gt;Alasdair MacIntyre's&lt;/a&gt; &lt;i&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/title/After+Virtue&quot;&gt;After Virtue&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/i&gt; offers a devastating though ultimately unconvincing diagnosis of the state of &lt;a href=&quot;/title/modern+society&quot;&gt;modern society&lt;/a&gt;. The argument is predominantly historical, and the crux of it is his account of the failure of &lt;a href=&quot;/title/the+enlightenment&quot;&gt;the enlightenment&lt;/a&gt; project of justifying &lt;a href=&quot;/title/morality&quot;&gt;morality&lt;/a&gt;. He argues that the philosophers of the enlightenment attempted to ground morality in &lt;a href=&quot;/title/human+nature&quot;&gt;human nature&lt;/a&gt;, rejecting all &lt;a href=&quot;/title/teleology&quot;&gt;teleology&lt;/a&gt;. However, the morality that the philosophers ascribed to was conventional, &lt;a href=&quot;/title/Christian&quot;&gt;Christian&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;/title/bourgeois&quot;&gt;bourgeois&lt;/a&gt;, and the only way to make it fit with their conception of human nature was a conception of human-nature-as-it-could-be-if-it-realized-its-&lt;i&gt;telos&lt;/i&gt;. Because such a conception was rejected, the project had to fail.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Morality before the enlightenment&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
MacIntyre argues that the dominant moral scheme in &lt;a href=&quot;/title/Europe&quot;&gt;Europe&lt;/a&gt; before the enlightenment was the tradition begun by &lt;a href=&quot;/title/Aristotle&quot;&gt;Aristotle&lt;/a&gt; and modified by &lt;a href=&quot;/title/medieval&quot;&gt;medieval&lt;/a&gt; Christian philosophers such as &lt;a href=&quot;/title/Thomas+Aquinas&quot;&gt;Aquinas&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;hellip;</content>
</entry><entry><title>Alasdair MacIntyre's Disquieting Suggestion (idea)</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://everything2.com:80/user/Teo-lohi/writeups/Alasdair+MacIntyre%2527s+Disquieting+Suggestion"/><id>http://everything2.com:80/user/Teo-lohi/writeups/Alasdair+MacIntyre%2527s+Disquieting+Suggestion</id><author><name>Teo-lohi</name><uri>http://everything2.com:80/user/Teo-lohi</uri></author><published>2006-04-15T19:01:44Z</published><updated>2006-04-15T19:01:44Z</updated>
<content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/title/Alasdair+MacIntyre&quot;&gt;Alasdair MacIntyre's&lt;/a&gt; &lt;i&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/title/After+Virtue&quot;&gt;After Virtue&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/i&gt; is one of the most thorough-going critiques of &lt;a href=&quot;/title/liberalism&quot;&gt;liberal&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;/title/democratic&quot;&gt;democratic&lt;/a&gt; culture there is. If MacIntyre's thesis is correct, then the last three hundred years of Western &lt;a href=&quot;/title/moral+philosophy&quot;&gt;moral&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;/title/political+philosophy&quot;&gt;political philosophy&lt;/a&gt; from the &lt;a href=&quot;/title/Enlightenment&quot;&gt;Enlightenment&lt;/a&gt; onwards has been a mistake. Furthermore, if MacIntyre is right, then modern &lt;a href=&quot;/title/liberal+democracy&quot;&gt;liberal democracies&lt;/a&gt; are essentially devoid of &lt;a href=&quot;/title/morality&quot;&gt;morality&lt;/a&gt;. In this writeup, I discuss MacIntyre's main thesis - the 'disquieting suggestion'.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;After Virtue&lt;/i&gt; begins with a dramatic analogy. MacIntyre asks us to imagine a world wherein &lt;a href=&quot;/title/natural+science&quot;&gt;natural science&lt;/a&gt; experiences a tremendous crisis. Scientists are blamed for environmental disasters, and the public at large turns against them. An anti-science political party gets into power, and abolishes the practice and teaching of science. Later, however, a pro-science movement emerges, and attempts to pick up the pieces. But all that remains is&amp;hellip;</content>
</entry><entry><title>2006 Finnish Presidential Elections (thing)</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://everything2.com:80/user/Teo-lohi/writeups/2006+Finnish+Presidential+Elections"/><id>http://everything2.com:80/user/Teo-lohi/writeups/2006+Finnish+Presidential+Elections</id><author><name>Teo-lohi</name><uri>http://everything2.com:80/user/Teo-lohi</uri></author><published>2006-01-04T17:01:36Z</published><updated>2006-01-04T17:01:36Z</updated>
<content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;UPDATE 30.01.06:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
The election was decided yesterday in a second round of voting. The Social Democratic candidate, current president Tarja Halonen was re-elected with 51.8 per cent of the vote. Sauli Niinisto, candidate of the National Coalition Party, got 48.2 per cent. The inevitable happened - the incredibly popular president won. I'm very dissapointed, given that the last polls before the election showed that Niinisto had a chance to win. Oh well. Perhaps we will get a better president in 2012.&lt;/p&gt; 

&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Today, Finns hit the polls as early voting begins in the &lt;a href=&quot;/title/Presidents+of+Finland&quot;&gt;presidential&lt;/a&gt; elections. The main election day is the 15th of January, and if there is a second round, it will be held on the 29th of January. The president of the Republic of Finland is elected for a term of six years, and the president can be re-elected once. The president's main responsibility is to lead Finnish &lt;a href=&quot;/title/foreign+policy&quot;&gt;foreign policy&lt;/a&gt; in co-operation with the government, and to act as an opinion leader.&amp;hellip;</content>
</entry><entry><title>The Confutation of Tyndale's Answer (idea)</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://everything2.com:80/user/Teo-lohi/writeups/The+Confutation+of+Tyndale%2527s+Answer"/><id>http://everything2.com:80/user/Teo-lohi/writeups/The+Confutation+of+Tyndale%2527s+Answer</id><author><name>Teo-lohi</name><uri>http://everything2.com:80/user/Teo-lohi</uri></author><published>2005-11-25T00:33:45Z</published><updated>2005-11-25T00:33:45Z</updated>
<content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/title/Martin+Luther&quot;&gt;Martin Luther&lt;/a&gt; published his &lt;a href=&quot;/title/Martin+Luther%2527s+95+Theses&quot;&gt;95 theses&lt;/a&gt; in &lt;a href=&quot;/title/1517&quot;&gt;1517&lt;/a&gt;, setting in motion a &lt;a href=&quot;/title/Protestant+Reformation&quot;&gt;crisis&lt;/a&gt; that was to engulf Western European &lt;a href=&quot;/title/Christianity&quot;&gt;Christianity&lt;/a&gt;. Luther was denounced virulently by a number of &lt;a href=&quot;/title/Catholicism&quot;&gt;Catholic&lt;/a&gt; commentators. In &lt;a href=&quot;/title/England&quot;&gt;England&lt;/a&gt; his chief opponents were firstly King &lt;a href=&quot;/title/Henry+VIII&quot;&gt;Henry VIII&lt;/a&gt; and then predominantly the humanist scholar and lawyer Sir &lt;a href=&quot;/title/Thomas+More&quot;&gt;Thomas More&lt;/a&gt;. After Luther had published the &lt;i&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/title/Babylonian+Captivity+of+the+Church&quot;&gt;Babylonian Captivity of the Church&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/i&gt;, Henry replied with the &lt;i&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/title/Assertio+Septem+Sacramentorum&quot;&gt;Assertio Septem Sacramentorum&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/i&gt;, which upheld the Catholic doctrine of the seven &lt;a href=&quot;/title/Sacraments&quot;&gt;Sacraments&lt;/a&gt;. For this he received the title &lt;a href=&quot;/title/Fidei+Defensor&quot;&gt;Fidei Defensor&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;/title/Defender+of+the+Faith&quot;&gt;Defender of the Faith&lt;/a&gt;, from the &lt;a href=&quot;/title/Pope&quot;&gt;Pope&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt; 
	
&lt;p&gt;England was still firmly Catholic, but the &lt;a href=&quot;/title/Lutheranism&quot;&gt;Lutherans&lt;/a&gt; were gaining ground. One of the most important of these English Reformers was &lt;a href=&quot;/title/William+Tyndale&quot;&gt;William Tyndale&lt;/a&gt;. In 1525-1526 he published an English translation of the &lt;a href=&quot;/title/Bible&quot;&gt;Bible&lt;/a&gt;. Tyndale's translation and his Protestant doctrine drew the wrath of &lt;a href=&quot;/title/Thomas+More&quot;&gt;Thomas More&lt;/a&gt;,&amp;hellip;</content>
</entry></feed>
