Near Matches
Ignore Exact
Full Text
seminar paper: personal privacy
created by
prole
(
thing
) by
prole
(7 d)
(
print
)
?
(
I like it!
)
Tue May 16 2000 at 23:32:08
At some point, people became convinced that the
Internet
was a system more
anonymous
than not. They desire certain
services
available to them
online
, but expect that in order to get those services, they will not have to reveal their
identities
to anyone but the
entity
providing the service they seek. Predictably, this
contingent of internet users
feel threatened by the idea that
corporations
and
advertising agencies
are
monitoring
their activities on the internet and storing that
data
. Rather than take actions to
safeguard
themselves against this perceived
invasion
of their
privacy
, groups are beginning to attack what they probably believe is
the source of the problem
, the agencies that record "
marketing information
" about
individual users
. This is a
pointless exercise
because, of course, to really
protect oneself
anywhere, one must understand the nature of one's
environment
. Depending on an environment you have a
limited understanding
of to protect you is
counter-intelligent
.
A
timely example
of this is recent
legal action
taken against
DoubleClick
, an online
advertising
company. A California woman acting "on
behalf
of the public" (Anderson, 2000) and several
privacy advocates
are
suing
DoubleClick for "
unfair
and
deceptive business practices
." (Anderson, 2000) These suits are both
futile
and
naïve
. Even if these cases should be decided in favor of the
petitioners
and a
legal precedent
thus set, we have already seen how difficult it is for the
government
to exercise any control over the Internet. Likewise, the government has been unable or unwilling to protect
consumers
from traditional marketing
data repositories
, junk-mailers,
telemarketers
, and so on. Those facts demonstrate something about our
society
: very few things we do can be done anonymously. Furthermore, as long as it is in the
financial best interest
of businesses to continue this sort of monitoring and
interference
, the general public cannot depend on them to respect do not call or do not mail requests, or
the next generation
, the "opt-out"
cookie
that Double Click offers to persons who do not want to be included in the DoubleClick/
Abacus
database (DoubleClick recently merged with Abacus, a company that collects "offline" information such as names, phone numbers, and mailing addresses).
A survey of the
privacy policies
of
online companies
by the
Electronic Privacy Information Center
(EPIC) conducted this past
holiday season
found that "not a single one of them (
high-traffic websites
) fulfilled important elements of
Fair Information Practices
investigated in the survey. Fair Information Practices serve as basic guidelines for safeguarding
personal information
. Also
alarming
was the significant proportion (35 out of 100) of shopping sites that allowed
profile-based advertising
networks to operate." (EPIC Alert, 2000) The advertising networks EPIC is talking about are of the pre-DoubleClick/Abacus variety. That is, they track an
Internet user
's movements online, but do not link the data from the online world to another set of data about that person collected offline.
The practice mentioned in the EPIC survey is by no means an
uncommon
one. Many popular
websites
require users to accept some sort of cookie in order to get full functionality from the site. And these cookies already record the sort of information EPIC is upset about, mainly which websites a user visits. Companies claim to do this for the
benefit
of customers. DoubleClick's privacy policy, for instance, claims that data they collect is "used for the purpose of
targeting ads
and measuring ad effectiveness on behalf of DoubleClick's advertisers and Web publishers who specifically request it." Similar privacy statements may sound
non-threatening
, but because such agencies are essentially left to monitor themselves with regard to how well they maintain their
users' privacy
, there are no guarantees. Even if a
governing body
stepped in to ensure that businesses did meet certain privacy standards, enforcement would be
tricky
and, except when dealing with larger, more
reputable
firms, users'
personal information
would likely be no more
secure
.
While they may be
annoying
, the results of these marketing techniques are essentially
harmless
. As our world is increasingly more
connected
, we come to function more and more like a
small town
in terms of privacy;
information travels fast
er, and more people and businesses we interact with
virtually
"know" us. There are several ways for
concerned parties
to address this
potential
problem, but it's important to keep in mind that the worst thing marketers are likely to do to us is
spam
us into a state of frustration. And if they weren't doing it via the Internet, they'd still be doing it through more
traditional media
. While things as potentially
damaging
as our
medical records
can be freely distributed without
penalty
, extra
junk mail
seems like a somewhat
petty
concern.
Even if you buy into Diane Anderson's (Anderson, 2000)
logic
when she claims that, with firms recording everything you do online, you could someday be
refused custody
of your child because you had visited a
porn website
several years before (apparently profiling cookies have a snowball effect leading to
puritanical
societies where
statutes of limitations
are unheard of..), you can protect yourself without having to rely on
greedy
businesses to do something that means less
financial gain
for them. By learning more about the
technology
they are using, everyday Internet users can gain the tools they need to protect themselves from virtually all run-of-the-mill threats to their privacy. There is no
compelling reason
for people to believe that they should be handed the Internet on a
silver platter
. While the web may become increasingly "
user-friendly
," no one should make the assumption that when anyone -
evil corporation
or curious
hobbyist
- has access to another plane of understanding, they won't use that knowledge to ends that all users might not agree with.
For better or for worse, the Internet is
fueled
by
capitalism
. What was before the sole
domain
of
academics
has become an empire of
entrepreneurs
. Simply translated, that means that greed is everywhere and the average person getting online represents nothing more than a
sales opportunity
. Instead of waiting for
fate
or
Uncle Sam
to come down and protect them from the
hordes
of businesspeople, users need to
educate
themselves and in doing so reclaim the
anonymity
that has become so precious in a networked world.
Bibliography
Anderson, Diane, "The
Trouble
with DoubleClick".
The Industry Standard
, January 28, 2000.
Electronic Privacy Information Center, "
EPIC
Releases Survey of
Online Privacy Policies
".
EPIC Alert
, January 12, 2000.
printable version
chaos
seminar paper: 1984
Turkish Shesh-Besh
Electronic Communications Privacy Act
Information Science
cross writing
privacy rights
Atlantic
Database Nation
If cryptography is outlawed, bayl bhgynjf jvyy unir cevinpl
DoubleClick Master Database
DoubleClick
Big Brother
data mining
Y'know, if you
log in
, you can write something here, or contact authors directly on the site.
Create a New User
if you don't already have an account.
Login
Password
remember me
password reminder
register
Everything2 Help
What you are reading:
People's Park
false friend
Chinese has three words for "river"
Lamed Vav Zaddikim
Oxford English Dictionary
Why the willow weeps
the water cooler is evil
deliciously oily
runcible spoon
Oresteia
Gollum vs. Regis Philbin
The Strong Programme
Super Candles
Ysardo
a brother to a sister
(
personal
)
antigravpussy
your warm whispers
(
personal
)
Clarke
Multiculturalism
(
idea
)
aneurin
Earl of Landaff
(
person
)
Heitah
Pseudocide
(
idea
)
XWiz
Google Knol
(
lede
)
Mythi
July 24, 2008
(
personal
)
locke baron
The fall of Earth
(
fiction
)
BookReader
Fear the Cold
(
dream
)
Pavlovna
Kathleen MacInnes
(
person
)
stainedglass
1
(
fiction
)
kalen
Three "T"s
(
idea
)
octillion369
Undead
(
idea
)
archiewood
Ico
(
fiction
)
Heisenberg
Why I love Everything2
(
log
)
E2 is a by-product of the existence of
The Everything Development Company