Everything2
Near Matches
Ignore Exact
Full Text
Everything2

What did Jesus look like?

created by lemuru

(idea) by lemuru (2.8 mon) (print)   ?   (I like it!) 1 C! Thu Aug 24 2000 at 21:47:40

The truth is, for all of the tens of thousands of depictions of Jesus, nobody really has even the vaguest ideas of what he looked like. Every depiction you have ever seen has been imaginings on the part of the author.

You see, the writers of the gospels were not too interested in really giving a biography of Jesus per se. Rather, they were attempting to describe the life and doings of a figure whom they were trying to construct a religion around. They wanted something to show to members of the early church that would strengthen and broaden its power, not something that would provide an in depth, down to earth description of their supposed christ. Therefore, they left a lot of things out--what Jesus' personality was really like, the precise nature of his family and lineage, and what he looked like. It seems to me that if you were trying to write a religious book about a messiah that you wanted other people to revere and believe in, you wouldn't want to make him too realistic and down to earth, since such a portrait would just make him seem more terrestrial. Rather, you would want to make him seem ethereal and majestic, and the only good way to do that would be to make him vague and mysterious by nature, since any concrete depiction would fall well short of an individual's preconceptions of what the son of god would be like. Think of monster movies: when the monster hides in the darkness killing people, he is scary and captivating because he is unknown. If he comes out of the shadows later on, he invariably falls short of expectations. And it's even worse when he's running around onscreen the entire time, since after the first five minutes, you've kind of acclimated.

Right, then. So the question is what did Jesus really look like. The usual picture you see everywhere of a really light skinned, blond guy with delicate bones is probably wrong. Think of the pictures of ancient Rabbis you've seen; none of them look anything like that. Yes, even then, war, migrations, and the like had polluted the gene pool to the point where there probably were Jews who had blond hair and light skin, but Jesus most likely had darkish skin, hair, and eyes. This is a far cry from the traditional western portraits of Jesus, and even farther from the pictures from the Greek Orthodox Church, which show him as kind of greenish skinned, limping, and with uneven legs. He also probably looked fairly normal and was lacking in glowing halos hovering atop his head, since none of the people he went and hung around with immediately recognized him as the messiah. Furthermore, he probably had shortish hair, since Paul wrote a bit in the New Testament where he said that long hair was disgraceful, and Paul probably wouldn't disrespect the Lord Thy God like that.

"But, man," sayeth you, "stop jerking me around. Forget the probablys and maybes. In the end, what did the Christ really look like?" The answer (if there is one): any way you want him to.

So I was listening to some lecture the other day, and the lecturer mentioned something about Daniel prophesizing pretty definitively about the coming of Jesus and what not. Now, I hadn't read The Book of Daniel in quite a long time, but I recall his visions as being incredibly strange and ambiguous, so after the lecture was over, I looked it up. . .among other things, it mentions the coming of one like the Son of Man and that this character will have "hair of his head like the pure wool." (Daniel 7:9) My Bible cross references this with Revelations 1:14 which says of the Son of Man "his hairs were white like wool, as white as snow." I don't see any mention of ebony colored skin, but this might be the thing Quad is seizing upon. . .The problem that both of these descriptions take place during apocalyptic visions, which are crazy, metaphor ridden, and painfully ambiguous.

I happened to remember right about Daniel: his vision, as I mentioned, does speak of the Son of Man, and he does speak of God's coming dominion, but his terms and descriptions are about as clear as mud. It is amidst all sorts of crazy stuff involving dragons, horns, and beasts. The traditional reading is that these aren't visions about the end of the world, but rather an allegory about history: the warring among these dragons and beasts is not about Judgement, but rather about these pagan nations fighting and swollowing eachother up - the author is simply describing history as he knows it to be in a veiled language in order to stay out of trouble with the state. Keeping with this idea, the one as the Son of Man is not the Messiah; rather, it is the concept of a Jewish ruled Zion. Where the other kingdoms, the pagan kingdoms, were in the forms of wild monsters, the Jewish kingdom would be strong and enlightened - it would be as a white clad man in comparison with these beasts. It should be mentioned that the term "Son of Man" was not coined for Jesus, nor was it a classical Messianic title. Rather, it seems to simply have been a way of saying "man" (Ezekiel was also referred to as the Son of Man, and he definitely was no Messiah). So using Daniel as proof of Jesus having woolly hair seems a bit specious. . .

As for Revelations, that quote seems to offer a much greater deal of proof. It seems to me that John, regardless if he were writing about the ultimate coming of the Messiah at Judgement or, as some have conjectured, in some kind of allegory about the past, present, or future, he seems to have had the vision of Jesus firmly in mind. Barring any questions of John actually having seen Jesus, my problem with using this last as proof of Jesus being definitively black and having wooly hair is chiefly one of semantics: he does not claim that Jesus' hair felt like wool; rather, he says that Jesus' hair was as white as wool. John is not making a statement about the hair's quality or feeling, but rather simply about its color.

Ultimately, because of these ambiguities, my conclusion is as it was before: there is no definitive description of who Jesus was and exactly what he looked like. It seems to me, at the very last, this is all one is left with: Jesus Christ is a personal messiah. He supposedly suffered for a personal salvation, and will later personally come to save the righteous. By this, he is your personal savior, and hence must look as you envision him appearing.

(idea) by achan (1.5 mon) (print)   ?   (I like it!) Thu Aug 24 2000 at 23:17:06

The Rastafarians say that scriptures prophesized him as a person with "the hair of whose head was like wool, whose feet were unto burning brass". This is where the ebony skin colour comes from in Quad's writeup.

Of course, to them, it's very easy to find out what Jesus looked like. Just do a web search for Ras Tafari or Haile Selassie.

References: virtually any page on Rastafarianism on the web. They all seem to be almost verbatim duplicates of eachother.

(idea) by teleny (1.8 d) (print)   ?   (I like it!) Fri Oct 26 2001 at 22:26:21

About the only races we can definitively rule out are that he was Benin African, Eastern Asian, Pacific Islander, or Native American, since it's unlikely that any of these peoples had much traffic in 1st century Judea, nevermind the problems of integrating such a person into the detailed geneology of the Gospel of Matthew. The "black Jesus" beloved of African-Americans is a bit of Afrocentricity of quite recent coinage, and can be seen as a way to distance the "good" Jesus from "evil" Eurocentric culture.

For what it's worth, the earliest paintings of Jesus, done in Egypt by Africans with encaustic, which does not fade, show a bearded man with brown straight hair, parted in the middle, and caught in a ponytail, large brown eyes, thin lips, and a fairly slim build. Less than a century later, later, we see the "Sun of God" portraits, done in mosaic in Greece, which have him a beardless (and quite well-endowed) young man, blonde, fair-skinned, blue-eyed, and with the attributes of Apollo, which were quickly shelved in favor of the "Imperial Jesus", which had the attributes of the Byzantine nobility (generalized Mediterranian), which has persisted (with various revisions) until the present. Recent reconstructions published by The Times of London show a stubby fellow (about five feet tall), with strongly Semitic features, curly brown hair, bushy beard, and full lips, an agreeable face, yes, but somewhat less than regal.

It's also worth pointing out that few ancient authors were all that keen on verbal portraiture or the kind of journalistic details we think of as being someone's "real personality": unless someone was of such striking appearance or behavior that every feature was worth recording, there is very little to go on as to how most people looked....it was just too much of a waste of papyrus and parchment (remember, parchment is leather, and even leather was more in demand than now) to record such trifles. Remember this, the next time you toss out some paper...


printable version
chaos

My mother and two Rastafarians well-endowed The Visual Display of Quantitative Information Final Fantasy IV
Jesus was a Gay Black Hippie Jew Jesus did not speak English Benin Satan
Rastafarian Rabbi The Crucifixion of Christ Jesus undoubtedly said this or something very like it
What girls aren't taught Ras Tafari Jesus God
Christmaster 2000 UK drug classification No Jesus, No Peace The Psychological and Spiritual Necessity to view Christ as man and then God
uncertainty principle Everything Purity Test Son of Man Afrocentric
Y'know, if you log in, you can write something here, or contact authors directly on the site. Create a New User if you don't already have an account.
  Epicenter
Login
Password

password reminder
register

Everything2 Help

Cool Staff Picks
What you are reading:
R.E.M. ordering breakfast at Denny's at 3 AM
The lightning men
anime
House of Flying Daggers
Multimedia software essentials 2D IMAGE EDITING
Henry V
Are you in the light or in the dark?
Impact of the Marshall Court
Tell me about your secret places
Faheem Williams
viral marketing
Gay Niggers from Outer Space
Invisible Man
New Writeups
Pavlovna
My Better Half(fiction)
kanoodle
Molson muscle(essay)
aneurin
You pays your money and you takes your choice(idea)
shaogo
July 20, 2008(log)
Glowing Fish
Tualatin River(place)
The Jacket
Words of Advice(idea)
John_Fox
Good Intentions Gone Wrong(person)
Heitah
Posthumous Oscar(thing)
ignis_glaciesque
University of South Florida(place)
ignis_glaciesque
Flogstaskriket(idea)
liveforever
Caesar's last breath(idea)
dagnyswaggart
she wants to believe(personal)
antigravpussy
he doesn't know, but her eyes widen too far(thing)
dagnyswaggart
Wild tides guard her secrets(poetry)
Lord Brawl
Caesar's last breath(poetry)
E2 is a by-product of the existence of The Everything Development Company