The article also implied this is happening more now with DSL and cable modem connections, becuase they're always on. Well, I've got news for you, bucko: If you don't leave your computer on all the time, the Internet connection isn't on all the time either. If you're a casual user who maybe uses their computer 1-2 hours a day, and isn't relying on it for any services, just turn the damn thing off, okay?
Some people think you should leave your computer on all the time, claiming things like component stress and the like. I say, feh. A computer burns about 100 watts if it's not in suspend mode (if it's in suspend mode, the components will stress powering back up, anyway.) That's 2400 watt-hours a day, or 2.4kwh. At 10 cents a Kwh, that's 25 cents a day, roughly, or about 7 or 8 dollars a month. Over the 3 year lifetime of your computer, you'll have spent over $200 trying to prevent the components from being stressed. You're basically taking the chance that any potential failure you'd get by turning it on and off is worth more than $200, and that leaving it on isn't itself a problem. I live in a house without air conditioning and if I left my machine on all the time in the summer it would definitely be damaging--much more so than the anecdotal "component stress". Buying an AC just to cool my computer when I'm not using it would be even more wasteful. And yes, I know conservation isn't in vogue unless you live in California right now, but do you really have the right to leave your computer on, causing utilities to have to build more polluting power plants in other people's backyards? You don't have to be a tree hugger to see the sensibilty of using less power so our electrical grid remains stable.
Now, I'm not saying you shouldn't leave your computer on all the time if you're actually using it, as a home server, or for serious work, but I really think leaving it on all the time to run SETI@Home is stupid. And if you're a user who doesn't understand network security and has DSL or cable modem Internet access, you aren't cool enough to leave your computer on all the time. Besides, DSL isn't really always on if you're using PPPoE to connect--it's just like a regular dialup connection. And you probably don't have a static address either.
I guess I'm just mad at the assumption that you should leave your computer on all the time. For most people, there's no need. Only do it if you have a tangible reason; otherwise, save the energy, go out, take a walk, whatever.
Yeah, it puts wear on your components, but really, is it that big of a deal? If you don't buy shoddy parts, they'll last. My Mac Quadra 700, purchased well over 6 years ago, turned on and off all the time, and eventually left on 24/7 for almost a year...and hey, it still runs fine!
I leave my G4 on all the time, as it runs SETI@Home and I just am impatient and don't like waiting for things to boot up. I also like to leave things open so I can come back them later, where I might have forgotten had I not left the computer on.
My PC has no monitor, it runs only FreeBSD and as such, I leave it on. This is partially because it was my first attempt at building a computer, and thus it's not entirely reliable. Sometimes it fails to detect one of the DIMMs on start up. Sometimes it refuses to even enter the BIOS and just makes a loud beeping noise. Basically, it's safer to leave it on than to risk rebooting it all the time. Plus, I like my l33t 60 day uptimes.
Use your computer the way you want to. Computers are hardier machines than most people believe, if they are understood properly. Any difference affected by turning it on and off, or just leaving it running, will be negligable in the scheme of things. And after all, chances are your computer will be obsolete within two or three years anyway, so you might as buy a new one. It's no big deal if the one you have now would die in five years with your current usage habits, since you won't be using it then anyway. Hopefully.
If you're running a server or an important networked computer, you basically don't have a say in this: it's on all the time, or you're out of business. But for the plucky end users who are curious as to the consequences of their power-saving/power-wasting decisions, here now is the ...
PROS
CONS
So, in the end, we see the argument is pretty trivial in and of itself, and it boils down to two major arguments: economics and convenience. Sure, running your computer full time may give it an additional brain freeze or two, but hey! It'll be hopelessly obsolete within 18 months anyway, and it might be just as bad as the stop-start dynamics of rebooting on a regular basis. Worried about noise or memory leaks? Concerned that someone out there might not be donating their CPU for the good of mankind? Seriously, go lie down. You'll feel much better. But if you think being able to surf the web, play a game, write a paper, or listen to a song without having to wait 5 minutes is worth roughly 3 cents a day, then you've made up your mind. And if you're a penny-pinching curmudgeon or a poor college student looking to save a buck or two ... well, you can just use 1-800-CALL-ATT.
Sources: http://computer.howstuffworks.com/question328.htm http://www.blue-tree.co.uk/guides/power_supply_on_or_off.html
printable version chaos
Everything2 Help