Even more amusing was the dismissive attitude the administrapo and the faculty had towards these hoaxes. Most common excuses was "it doesn't matter if they were true or not, the discrimination is very true and occurs regularly". They also praised the liars, for bringing attention to the racist and sexist issues in American colleges. Good job for encouraging the trend they don't claim to exist.
I wonder if the Cornell Progressive newspaper would choose to print this article. I doubt it. Oh well. If I want to publish it, I would go to the Cornell Review, which is, in all facets, a superior piece of journalism.
Or perhaps it isn't such a new trend. See Cornell '69 : Liberalism and the Crisis of the American University. You might find it interesting because it was a true event.
Bah! I can't even crack a joke on the overwhelmingly liberal population of Massachusetts? While it's OK to bash China day and night, over whatever issue that comes to the minds of the liberal media? Fine. I'll make fun of NYC next time. Or perhaps California. OK?
Honestly, what the hell does that mean? DMan, that entire node was well written and informative, but why take a cheap shot at Massachusetts? Surely you could have filled that bullet with some other text.
Really, what about Massachusetts causes you to expect its residents to falsify hate crimes? Is there a history of the state's citizens falsifying hate crimes? Any more so, than, say, New York, or Texas, or Florida? Hey, if that's true, node the evidence and I'll vote for it. Otherwise, it's just a cheap shot at the Bay State.
Take for example Ray Lewis of the Baltimore Ravens. Most of the sports media (but, proving why they're number one, not ESPN) made it seem as though Lewis was guilty beyond a shadow of a doubt. Guess what? Prosecution cut a deal, because there was no chance of a conviction. But hey, he's a football player accused of murder. He must have done it.
And remember when a Dallas woman accused Michael Irvin or tying her up, forcing her to do drugs, and then raping her? Why were the charges dropped? Because she admitted that she made it up, and only used Irvin's name because she had heard of his legal problems on the news and thought she could get a quick out-of-court settlement from a man not willing to risk further embarassment.
A gay student from Wyoming, Matthew Shepard, ruthlessly enticed two hot-blooded, all-american boys into tying him to a tree, forcing them to beat and burn him. The poor boys underwent temporary insanity when confronted with something that wasn't, well, all-american and hot-blooded and, understandably, had to kill him. Calling this a "hate crime" because they tortured and murdered a homosexual they hated is just a dangerous semantic game that casts a terrible slur on these innocent boys.
I hope that was informative. Of course, I can't provide ISBN numbers, page references, or other citations because... well I just can't. Its not that I'm making it up, scouts honour - its all very scientific and objective. Now, where was that paper on "Public Displays of Fun and Why We Should Object" I was writing...
printable version chaos
Everything2 Help