Everything2
Near Matches
Ignore Exact
Full Text
Everything2

Cochran et. al. v. Louisiana State School Board of Education et. al.

created by Lometa

(idea) by Lometa (6.8 hr) (print)   ?   (I like it!) 1 C! Wed Jan 24 2001 at 17:39:38

Cochran et. al. v. Louisiana State School Board of Education et. al.

281 U. S. 370, 30 S. Ct. 335, 74 L. Ed. 913 (1930)

    Facts : The Louisiana Legislature enacted a statute appropriating money to supply free textbooks for the use of the school children of the State, both those in private as well as in the public schools. The plaintiffs as citizens and taxpayers of the State brought suit to enjoin the defendant State Board of Education from spending State money under the statute, on the ground that to do so would be to take the private property (in the form of tax money) for private purposes, in violation of the 14th Amendment to the federal constitution and similar provisions in the state constitution.

    Issue: Is it constitutionally permissible for a state to provide free textbooks for children attending private schools?

    Decision: Yes, injunction refused.

    Reasoning:
    1. The money is not appropriated for the use of private schools, but for the benefit of the children attending them (the "child benefit theory"). The schools are not the beneficiaries.
    2. The statute does not and could not lawfully permit the purchase from state funds for books used in religious instruction by sectarian school; thus the statute does not discriminate between public and private schools.
    3. For these reasons, the power of taxation is being exercised for a public and not a private purpose]. The education of children is a public purpose.

    Significance: This decision of the U.S. Supreme Court is significant in the area of separation between church and state, because, by adopting the child benefit theory, it holds that a state statute providing free textbooks for the pupils of both public and private schools does not violate the 14th Amendment. Undoubtedly, the decision is limited to statutes applying only to accredited schools, since if a school is not accredited, its pupils would not be in compliance with the provisions of compulsory school attendance statutes.

Sources:

Corkill, Phillip. The Law and American Education. Tucson, Arizona. 1991 (Lecture presented at the Flowing Wells School District Administrative Office).


Important Landmark Cases in Educational Law


printable version
chaos

Important Landmark Cases in Educational Law The Law and American Education children Separation of church and state
Amendment XIV I bent my wookiee compulsory United States Supreme Court
Constitutionally textbook Statute legislature
Louisiana the O.J. Simpson trial In defence of the right not to say the Pledge A Prairie Home Companion
critical thinking violate Attendance benefit
Discriminate purpose instruction Permissible
Y'know, if you log in, you can write something here, or contact authors directly on the site. Create a New User if you don't already have an account.
  Epicenter
Login
Password

password reminder
register

Everything2 Help

Cool Staff Picks
Nodes your grandma would have liked:
Fred Phelps
Nystagmus
Antietam
High Society
Vicar or whatever
Brazil
All the gold you can eat
Comfort women
Limited liability company
Wilfred Owen
Mystery Science Theater 3000
The Who
Benford's Law
New Writeups
antigravpussy
One fly amongst many(person)
sam512
Moon Base Shackleton, 1978(fiction)
Pavlovna
toy boy(person)
XWiz
tear jerker(review)
Heitah
Anarchy is Order(idea)
jessicaj
July 26, 2008(dream)
Berek
ABBA(person)
devolution
k-hole(place)
Nadine_2
The Sound Of Madness(review)
SwimmingMonkey
Conversations with Fo Fo, the Loneliest dog in Purgatory(fiction)
locke baron
lynx(thing)
Simulacron3
Reality, Dimensions and the Natural Ontology(essay)
SubSane
Making Love to a 9-Foot Woman(person)
Ouzo
Thoughts(idea)
antigravpussy
I fall silent, listening. The breadcrumbs are talking about us(person)
This affordable entertainment brought to you by The Everything Development Company