<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:base="http://everything2.com/">
    <title>montecarlo's New Writeups</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://everything2.com/index.pl?node=Everything%20User%20Search&amp;usersearch=montecarlo" />
    <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="?node=New%20Writeups%20Atom%20Feed&amp;type=ticker&amp;foruser=montecarlo" />
    <id>http://everything2.com/?node=New%20Writeups%20Atom%20Feed&amp;foruser=montecarlo</id>
    <updated>2009-09-22T18:50:51Z</updated>
<entry><title>Djurgården (place)</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://everything2.com:80/user/montecarlo/writeups/Djurg%25E5rden"/><id>http://everything2.com:80/user/montecarlo/writeups/Djurg%25E5rden</id><author><name>montecarlo</name><uri>http://everything2.com:80/user/montecarlo</uri></author><published>2009-09-22T18:50:51Z</published><updated>2009-09-22T18:50:51Z</updated>
<content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;A park afloat&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Djurgården&lt;/b&gt; (= &quot;Animal Garden&quot; in Swedish, approximate &lt;a href=&quot;/title/Swedish+pronunciation&quot;&gt;Swedish pronunciation&lt;/a&gt; &quot;&lt;i&gt;yeur-gaur-dehn&lt;/i&gt;&quot;) is one of the many &lt;a href=&quot;/title/island&quot;&gt;island&lt;/a&gt;s that the &lt;a href=&quot;/title/city&quot;&gt;city&lt;/a&gt; of &lt;a href=&quot;/title/Stockholm&quot;&gt;Stockholm&lt;/a&gt; actually consists of. It can be seen as a large &lt;a href=&quot;/title/city&quot;&gt;city&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;/title/park&quot;&gt;park&lt;/a&gt;, floating on the &lt;a href=&quot;/title/Baltic+Sea&quot;&gt;Baltic Sea&lt;/a&gt;. Officially Djurgården is called &lt;i&gt;Kungliga Djurgården&lt;/i&gt; (= &lt;a href=&quot;/title/Royal&quot;&gt;Royal&lt;/a&gt; Djurgården). In this case the official epithet &quot;Royal&quot; is not just a quaint reminder of bygone days, like the &quot;Royal&quot; in the institutional names of the &quot;Royal Dramatic Theatre&quot; or the &quot;Royal Opera&quot;. Djurgården is in fact &lt;i&gt;directly owned&lt;/i&gt; by the &lt;a href=&quot;/title/King&quot;&gt;King&lt;/a&gt; of &lt;a href=&quot;/title/Sweden&quot;&gt;Sweden&lt;/a&gt; and is managed in the same manner as the King's Royal Palaces, by a special Royal Office (Kungliga Djurgårdens Förvaltning).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;small&gt;The King's official &lt;a href=&quot;/title/ownership&quot;&gt;ownership&lt;/a&gt; of Djurgården is hardly noticeable to the inhabitants of Stockholm &amp;ndash; you are as free to &lt;a href=&quot;/title/stroll&quot;&gt;stroll&lt;/a&gt; among the &lt;a href=&quot;/title/ancient&quot;&gt;ancient&lt;/a&gt; oaks (some are over a thousand years&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&amp;hellip;</content>
</entry><entry><title>September 17, 2009 (event)</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://everything2.com:80/user/montecarlo/writeups/September+17%252C+2009"/><id>http://everything2.com:80/user/montecarlo/writeups/September+17%252C+2009</id><author><name>montecarlo</name><uri>http://everything2.com:80/user/montecarlo</uri></author><published>2009-09-17T11:58:50Z</published><updated>2009-09-17T11:58:50Z</updated>
<content type="html">&lt;p&gt;September 17 1939 &amp;ndash; 70 years ago &amp;ndash; is a fateful day to remember. Because this was the September day in 1939 when the beginning of the Second World War was finalised. The two totalitarian allies, who were responsible for the start of the war, Hitler's Nazis and Stalin's &lt;a href=&quot;/title/Communist&quot;&gt;Communist&lt;/a&gt;s, now joined forces on the battlefield, as previously agreed in their &lt;a href=&quot;/title/Molotov-Ribbentrop+Pact&quot;&gt;Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact&lt;/a&gt;. Poland, already buckling under heavy attack from the West by &lt;a href=&quot;/title/Nazi&quot;&gt;Nazi&lt;/a&gt; Germany, was now additionally invaded by a huge Soviet Russian army from the East.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Not long after, Russian and German troops were able to hold a joint and joyous &lt;a href=&quot;/title/victory+parade&quot;&gt;victory parade&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;/title/Poland&quot;&gt;Poland&lt;/a&gt; was partitioned between two gangster regimes. Innocent &lt;a href=&quot;/title/blood&quot;&gt;blood&lt;/a&gt; was soon to flow in torrents, on both sides of the demarcation line. And the two totalitarian gangsters continued fighting on the same side in WWII for two years, pitted against the democratic West.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;All of this would of course just be old history, not much to worry about, were it not for&amp;hellip;</content>
</entry><entry><title>Ritual truth (idea)</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://everything2.com:80/user/montecarlo/writeups/Ritual+truth"/><id>http://everything2.com:80/user/montecarlo/writeups/Ritual+truth</id><author><name>montecarlo</name><uri>http://everything2.com:80/user/montecarlo</uri></author><published>2009-08-25T15:48:38Z</published><updated>2009-08-25T15:48:38Z</updated>
<content type="html">&lt;p&gt;According to some polls, 60% of the American population regards the Biblical account of the &lt;a href=&quot;/title/creation&quot;&gt;creation&lt;/a&gt; of the world &amp;ndash; and that it occurred about 10 000 years ago &amp;ndash; as the literal truth.
Now, 'truth' is a &lt;a href=&quot;/title/slippery&quot;&gt;slippery&lt;/a&gt; concept, as philosophers have been saying for millennia. There is normally no problem with analytical truth, the one you may come across in mathematics or &lt;a href=&quot;/title/logic&quot;&gt;logic&lt;/a&gt;. 'All spinsters are single' is truly the truth and nothing but.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But the sort of truth that witnesses promise to tell in courts of law is a muddier affair. Memory is infamously unreliable. We can be almost certain that a witness account of 'what really happened' is &lt;i&gt;not&lt;/i&gt; 'the whole truth and nothing but the truth'. But it might not be entirely false either. If cross-referenced by other &lt;a href=&quot;/title/witness&quot;&gt;witness&lt;/a&gt; accounts, it may even turn out to be legally useful, in spite of its lack of 'literal truth'.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h4&gt;Literally refuted&lt;/h4&gt;

&lt;p&gt;What about maintaining that the biblical creation myth is 'literal truth'? The 'literal' part&amp;hellip;</content>
</entry><entry><title>Theology saves (idea)</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://everything2.com:80/user/montecarlo/writeups/Theology+saves"/><id>http://everything2.com:80/user/montecarlo/writeups/Theology+saves</id><author><name>montecarlo</name><uri>http://everything2.com:80/user/montecarlo</uri></author><published>2008-12-18T13:20:27Z</published><updated>2008-12-18T13:20:27Z</updated>
<content type="html">&lt;h4&gt;Theology vs. superstition&lt;/h4&gt;

&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Theology is a speculative tradition of thought. Its intellectual starting point is a number of unprovable &lt;a href=&quot;/title/assumption&quot;&gt;assumption&lt;/a&gt;s. Isn't this close to superstition -- accepting unprovable assumptions? Not necessarily. We actually have another speculative tradition (almost as old as theology), where people also start out with unprovable assumptions, and arrive at highly interesting conclusions. That tradition of thought is called &lt;a href=&quot;/title/mathematics&quot;&gt;mathematics&lt;/a&gt;, and it enjoys a great deal of prestige. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;So by analogy, theology, in spite of its unprovable assumptions, may possibly also be regarded as a reasonably &lt;a href=&quot;/title/respectable&quot;&gt;respectable&lt;/a&gt; undertaking. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;What then is superstition? How does it differ from theology? As we have noted, theology emerges from unprovable assumptions and may thus get it into trouble, but not necessarily. &lt;a href=&quot;/title/Superstition&quot;&gt;Superstition&lt;/a&gt; on the other hand emerges from solidly disproved ideas, like believing&amp;hellip;</content>
</entry><entry><title>Vatican + Science = True (idea)</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://everything2.com:80/user/montecarlo/writeups/Vatican+%252B+Science+%253D+True"/><id>http://everything2.com:80/user/montecarlo/writeups/Vatican+%252B+Science+%253D+True</id><author><name>montecarlo</name><uri>http://everything2.com:80/user/montecarlo</uri></author><published>2008-09-30T12:13:36Z</published><updated>2008-09-30T12:13:36Z</updated>
<content type="html">&lt;h4&gt;A declaration of sanity&lt;/h4&gt;

&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The &lt;a href=&quot;/title/Vatican&quot;&gt;Vatican&lt;/a&gt; recently declared that Catholic faith and modern science (including the theory of evolution) are &lt;a href=&quot;/title/compatible&quot;&gt;compatible&lt;/a&gt; and not in conflict. The declaration is undoubtedly a promising sign of religious &lt;a href=&quot;/title/sanity&quot;&gt;sanity&lt;/a&gt;. Whether all official &lt;a href=&quot;/title/Catholic&quot;&gt;Catholic&lt;/a&gt; standpoints (e.g. the Vatican's anti-&lt;a href=&quot;/title/condom&quot;&gt;condom&lt;/a&gt; stance) can really be reconciled with scientific findings may yet remain doubtful. Nevertheless, the declaration shows that not all religious movements are on the level of stone-age superstition, the regrettable plane where &lt;a href=&quot;/title/George+W.+Bush&quot;&gt;G. W. Bush's&lt;/a&gt; American Christian fundamentalists and Tehran's Muslim fundamentalists have squarely positioned themselves. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h4&gt;Metaphorically does it&lt;/h4&gt;

&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The actual text of the &lt;a href=&quot;/title/Bible&quot;&gt;Bible&lt;/a&gt; (or &lt;a href=&quot;/title/Quran&quot;&gt;Quran&lt;/a&gt;) and modern &lt;a href=&quot;/title/science&quot;&gt;science&lt;/a&gt; are in fact often in conflict. This is of course readily predictable with mythological texts written &lt;a href=&quot;/title/millennium&quot;&gt;millennia&lt;/a&gt; ago. So the Vatican declaration states that&amp;hellip;</content>
</entry><entry><title>Military economics: an equivocal song (idea)</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://everything2.com:80/user/montecarlo/writeups/Military+economics%253A+an+equivocal+song"/><id>http://everything2.com:80/user/montecarlo/writeups/Military+economics%253A+an+equivocal+song</id><author><name>montecarlo</name><uri>http://everything2.com:80/user/montecarlo</uri></author><published>2008-09-03T14:57:30Z</published><updated>2008-09-03T14:57:30Z</updated>
<content type="html">&lt;h4&gt;Military economics: an equivocal song&lt;/h4&gt;

&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The &lt;a href=&quot;/title/colonel&quot;&gt;colonel&lt;/a&gt; was a friendly-looking man in his mid-40's. He had made himself comfortable on the pretty glass veranda protruding from the temporary HQ building. This was where he received me, sitting behind a small table pretending to be a desk. Our Estonian &lt;a href=&quot;/title/unit&quot;&gt;unit&lt;/a&gt; was housed in three buildings of a middle-sized farm that had been made available for this exercise, whatever it was -- I had just arrived and was only vaguely informed. But it seemed all quite cozy and pleasant, considering that it was supposed to be some sort of a &lt;a href=&quot;/title/military&quot;&gt;military&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;/title/maneuvers&quot;&gt;maneuvers&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&quot;The &lt;a href=&quot;/title/Finnish&quot;&gt;Finnish&lt;/a&gt; boys in the &lt;a href=&quot;/title/bunker&quot;&gt;bunker&lt;/a&gt;, the one behind the &lt;a href=&quot;/title/birch&quot;&gt;birch&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;/title/grove&quot;&gt;grove&lt;/a&gt;, probably have to be &lt;a href=&quot;/title/reinforce&quot;&gt;reinforce&lt;/a&gt;d by our guys,&quot; he said slowly, without any sign of urgency. &quot;They must be bored to death by now, alone and without anything happening. Could you take care of it? Seven men or so will probably be enough.&quot; &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;I&amp;hellip;</content>
</entry></feed>
